Thinking of selling?
Start with recent sales, current competition and selling pace, then narrow the comparison to your home.
See the market evidenceDistinctive Communities · all residential MLS property types
The local differences, The market evidence, A clearer perspective on your next move
View all 1,523 properties by Parcel ID, with MLS sales and tax records
THE CURRENT PICTURE
East of Olive recorded 83 MLS-reported sales from October 15, 2025 through October 14, 2026, with a median sold price of $3,200,000 and median sold price per living square foot of $1,235. Active inventory was 41 listings on October 14, 2026. Recent sales carry West Palm Beach MLS city labels. All 83 East of Olive closings and the current Active inventory in this source are MLS-classified single-family residences. The report retains all residential MLS subtypes if they appear; the current figures are therefore not mixing in a condominium cohort. Owners should review current competition; buyers should compare size and condition within this community. All residential MLS property types are included; the housing mix affects the combined median.
A CLEARER WAY THROUGH THE REPORT
Use the path that fits why you are exploring East of Olive. Every figure links back to its period, sample and source.
Start with recent sales, current competition and selling pace, then narrow the comparison to your home.
See the market evidenceExplore daily life, recreation and the community’s setting, then compare the housing types and homes that fit your priorities.
Explore the communitySales 2025-10-15 through 2026-10-14; Active listings 2026-10-14.
| Community | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time | Active listings | Availability | MLS Months of supply | 1-year comparable $/LSF change | 5-year comparable $/LSF change | 10-year comparable $/LSF change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East of Olive | 83 | $3,200,000 83 usable sales | $1,235 83 usable sales | 71.5 days 82 usable sales | 41 | 2.78% 41 / 1,477 | 5.9 83 usable sales closings | +24.5% 73 baseline and 70 current usable sales | +113.2% 130 baseline and 70 current usable sales | +289.6% 64 baseline and 70 current usable sales |
Contract timing
This chart and the findings use this market’s recorded contract dates. The month of contract is different from the month a home was listed.
PurchaseContractDate, full calendar years, Bars show contract counts, not rates; the period totals are 477 in 2015–2019 and 486 in 2021–2025, The two periods each have at least 30 recorded contracts, 2020 and partial 2026 are excluded| Month | 2015–2019 | 2021–2025 |
|---|---|---|
| January | 49 | 48 |
| February | 56 | 59 |
| March | 53 | 60 |
| April | 58 | 61 |
| May | 41 | 38 |
| June | 45 | 33 |
| July | 33 | 28 |
| August | 32 | 34 |
| September | 20 | 30 |
| October | 39 | 27 |
| November | 22 | 33 |
| December | 29 | 35 |
In East of Olive, 180 of 486 recorded contracts in 2021–2025 were signed from February through April (37.0%). April had the most contracts: 61.
February–April accounted for 35.0% of 477 contracts in 2015–2019. The later share was 2.0 percentage points higher. This compares different homes over two complete five-year periods; it does not establish the best listing date for an individual property.
In the more recent 2023–2025 window, March led with 27 of 239 contracts. The shift in peak month is a reminder to check current inventory as well as the longer history.
MLS file last updated: September 27, 2026. Contracts are grouped by PurchaseContractDate; 2020 and the partial 2026 year are excluded from the comparisons. All residential property types are included.
Counts use distinct residential tax parcels, including residential lots and redevelopment sites. Each classification separately accounts for all 1,477 properties. Missing or conflicting tax labels remain unassigned. Tax labels can differ from MLS reporting labels; unavailable matches are not zero. Tax housing groups combine townhouses with villas and condos with co-ops. Multifamily parcels, where eligible, count as properties rather than dwelling units.
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| ALHAMBRA PL | 30 |
| ALMERIA RD | 16 |
| ALPINE RD | 26 |
| ALTON RD | 5 |
| ARAVALE RD | 3 |
| ARGYLE RD | 8 |
| ARLINGTON PL | 15 |
| ARLINGTON RD | 32 |
| ASHWORTH ST | 16 |
| AUSTIN LN | 2 |
| AVILA RD | 12 |
| BARCELONA RD | 14 |
| BELMONTE RD | 12 |
| BEVERLY RD | 27 |
| BLOOMFIELD DR | 19 |
| BUNKER RANCH RD | 22 |
| CHURCHILL RD | 11 |
| CONNISTON RD | 4 |
| CORDOVA RD | 11 |
| CORTEZ RD | 25 |
| COSTELLO RD | 22 |
| DESOTA RD | 20 |
| DYER RD | 10 |
| EDGEWOOD DR | 21 |
| EDMOR RD | 23 |
| ELLAMAR RD | 16 |
| ELWA PL | 23 |
| ESSEX CT | 3 |
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| ESSEX LN | 9 |
| FLAGLER CT | 13 |
| FLAGLER DR | 99 |
| FLAGLER PROMENADE | 9 |
| FLAGLER WAY | 2 |
| FLAMINGO DR | 10 |
| FOREST HILL BLVD | 22 |
| GRANADA RD | 13 |
| GRAY ST | 17 |
| GREENWOOD DR | 24 |
| GREGORY PL | 36 |
| GREGORY RD | 41 |
| GREYMON DR | 21 |
| LAKELAND DR | 18 |
| LAKEWOOD RD | 13 |
| LINDA LN | 16 |
| LYTTON CT | 17 |
| MALVERNE RD | 13 |
| MARLBOROUGH RD | 8 |
| MEDINA WAY | 5 |
| MIRAMAR WAY | 17 |
| MONCEAUX RD | 15 |
| MONROE DR | 20 |
| MURRAY RD | 26 |
| NOTTINGHAM BLVD | 9 |
| OLIVE AVE | 27 |
| PALMETTO LN | 18 |
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| PAMELA LN | 12 |
| PERSHING WAY | 17 |
| PILGRIM RD | 18 |
| PINE TER | 4 |
| PLYMOUTH RD | 16 |
| POTTER RD | 16 |
| PURITAN RD | 14 |
| QUEENS CT | 4 |
| RILYN DR | 7 |
| ROOSEVELT PL | 4 |
| ROYAL PALM RD | 1 |
| RUGBY RD | 10 |
| RUSSLYN DR | 20 |
| RUTLAND BLVD | 35 |
| SANTA LUCIA DR | 21 |
| SEVILLE RD | 30 |
| SUMMA ST | 23 |
| SUNSET RD | 15 |
| VALENCIA RD | 17 |
| VALLETTE WAY | 4 |
| VINCENT RD | 15 |
| WALTON BLVD | 11 |
| WASHINGTON RD | 107 |
| WENONAH PL | 9 |
| WESTMINSTER RD | 16 |
| WILDERMERE RD | 3 |
| WORTH CT | 42 |
| Tax city label | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| WEST PALM BEACH | 1,477 |
| Total | 1,477 |
| Tax development | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| East Of Olive | 1,477 |
| Total | 1,477 |
| Tax subdivision | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| East Of Olive | 1,477 |
| Total | 1,477 |
| Tax housing group | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| Single Family Residence | 1,471 |
| Townhouse / Villa | 6 |
| Total | 1,477 |
Closed sales cover October 15, 2025 through October 14, 2026; Active inventory is dated October 14, 2026. Housing, city and development tables describe the same sales from different angles. Medians require five usable observations.
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings | MLS Months of supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Palm Beach | 1,477 | 83 | $3,200,000 83 usable sales | $1,235 83 usable sales | 41 | 5.9 |
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings | MLS Months of supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family Residence | 1,471 | 83 | $3,200,000 83 usable sales | $1,235 83 usable sales | 41 | 5.9 |
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings | MLS Months of supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Of Olive | 1,477 | 83 | $3,200,000 83 usable sales | $1,235 83 usable sales | 41 | 5.9 |
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings | MLS Months of supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Of Olive | 1,477 | 83 | $3,200,000 83 usable sales | $1,235 83 usable sales | 41 | 5.9 |
Some sources provide only the parent development label. Those rows do not establish separate neighborhoods. Legal plat labels are retained as recorded. Where a finding refers to a low-volume group, its count is in the expandable table immediately above.
Owner mailing footprint · East of Olive
A starting point for considering listing outreach, alongside recent sales and other market evidence.
375 of 1,523 parcels (24.6%) have a recorded mailing address that differs from the property address. These counts describe tax-mail destinations, not residency, unique households or where buyers moved from.
See the combined Distinctive Communities state and county totals →
11 address comparisons need review. 9 have unavailable or confidential mailing details; 2 have possible same-property street or unit variations. They are included in the parcel total and excluded from both the same-property and off-property counts below.
Off-property addresses only · one count per parcel
| County / state | Parcels | Tax records |
|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 225 | View records ↗ |
| New York County (Manhattan)New YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 13 | View records ↗ |
| Miami-Dade CountyFlorida | 9 | — |
| Fairfield CountyConnecticutExplore Connecticut parcel intelligence → | 8 | Town assessors ↗ |
| Cook CountyIllinoisExplore county parcel intelligence → | 5 | View records ↗ |
| Marion CountyFlorida | 4 | View records ↗ |
| New Castle CountyDelaware | 4 | — |
359 of 371 U.S. off-property mailings have a county assignment: 333 address matches and 26 ZIP-based estimates. 12 remain unresolved. Rankings include the estimates and can change as unresolved addresses are matched.
371 off-property U.S. addresses
4 international mailings are excluded from U.S. state and county rankings.
Search Palm Beach County Property Appraiser ↗Search Palm Beach County tax bills ↗Open a state to see its counties. State totals include unresolved counties. Each number counts parcels with off-property mailing addresses.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 225 | 211 | 14 | View records ↗ |
| Miami-Dade CountyFlorida | 9 | 8 | 1 | — |
| Marion CountyFlorida | 4 | 4 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Martin CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 3 | 3 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Broward CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Indian River CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 1 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Volusia CountyFlorida | 2 | 2 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Duval CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Lee CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Orange CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 0 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Polk CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Seminole CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 8.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York County (Manhattan)New YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 13 | 12 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Westchester CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 4 | 4 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Nassau CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 3 | 2 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Monroe CountyNew York | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Suffolk CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Kings CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Onondaga CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Queens CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Rockland CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denton CountyTexas | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Tarrant CountyTexas | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Bexar CountyTexas | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Collin CountyTexas | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Harris CountyTexasExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Jefferson CountyTexas | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Midland CountyTexas | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Travis CountyTexas | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fairfield CountyConnecticutExplore Connecticut parcel intelligence → | 8 | 8 | 0 | Town assessors ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fulton CountyGeorgiaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| Cherokee CountyGeorgia | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 1.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bergen CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Atlantic CountyNew Jersey | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Cape May CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Essex CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Morris CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montgomery CountyPennsylvaniaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Chester CountyPennsylvania | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Philadelphia CountyPennsylvaniaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Washington CountyPennsylvania | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Westmoreland CountyPennsylvania | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cook CountyIllinoisExplore county parcel intelligence → | 5 | 5 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suffolk CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 3 | 2 | 1 | — |
| Barnstable CountyMassachusetts | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Norfolk CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Castle CountyDelaware | 4 | 2 | 2 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maricopa CountyArizonaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
No county assignments are available for this scope.
County unresolved: 3.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Louis CountyMissouri | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Jackson CountyMissouri | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheridan CountyWyoming | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Teton CountyWyoming | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles CountyCaliforniaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| San Diego CountyCaliforniaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fayette CountyKentucky | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Jefferson CountyKentucky | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butler CountyOhio | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Hamilton CountyOhio | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma CountyOklahoma | 2 | 1 | 1 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fairfax CountyVirginia | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Lynchburg cityVirginia | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lonoke CountyArkansas | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitkin CountyColoradoExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| District of ColumbiaDistrict of ColumbiaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltimore cityMaryland | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oakland CountyMichiganExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grafton CountyNew Hampshire | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iredell CountyNorth Carolina | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Union CountySouth Dakota | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamoille CountyVermont | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pierce CountyWashington | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milwaukee CountyWisconsin | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
Prepared 2026-10-12 from the tax snapshots underlying the established property directories (source files modified 2026-09-05). These file dates do not establish a tax-roll year. This scope contains 1,478 developed residential parcels and 45 residential vacant lots. Commercial, common-area and agricultural classifications are excluded. Multiple parcels belonging to one owner count separately.
Capitalization, punctuation, common street abbreviations, unit labels and ZIP+4 suffixes are normalized. Recorded legal-unit aliases are used when they identify one parcel at a building; mailing to a different recorded unit remains off-property. Uncertain local street or unit variants and confidential or missing mailing details are withheld from the off-property rankings. A different mailing address elsewhere within the same community can still qualify.
Counties use the U.S. Census Geocoder. If a street cannot be matched, a county is estimated only when its 2020 Census ZIP area falls in a single county and agrees with the mailing state. A ZIP area is an approximation of postal delivery geography; ZIP-based counts are estimates. County boundaries use the 2020 vintage, including Connecticut’s historical counties. Connecticut tax assessments are maintained by towns.
Published figures contain aggregate counts only. A mailing destination can be a home, business, trustee, adviser or post-office box. Unresolved addresses may change the final rankings.
Tax-mail destinations may be personal or second residences, businesses, family offices, trusts, registered agents, attorneys or accountants. These records describe existing ownership as of the source snapshot; they do not establish primary residence, where wealth is held, buyer origin, decision-making authority or purchase intent. Long-held properties and recent purchases both appear in this ownership snapshot.
IRS migration data measures year-to-year tax-filing address changes for a different population and period. It is complementary context, not a count of incoming homebuyers. Neither dataset identifies a qualified buyer or proves future demand.
Combine the ownership mailing footprint with relevant sales, pricing and the home’s specific appeal when considering listing distribution.
Request a listing outreach strategy →| Housing category | Tax-record housing stock | Active listings | Availability | Trailing-year sales | MLS Months of supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All residential | 1,477 | 41 | 2.78% | 83 | 5.9 83 usable sales |
| Single family | 1,471 | 41 | 2.79% | 83 | 5.9 83 usable sales |
| Condominium / cooperative | No matching tax stock | 0 | Unavailable | 0 | Limited sample 0 usable sales |
| Townhome / villa | 6 | 0 | 0% | 0 | Limited sample 0 usable sales |
Availability is Active listings ÷ tax-record housing stock. Property-type MLS months of supply is shown only with at least five sales. The overall row uses unique residential parcels and is not the sum of MLS listing counts.
Buyer-financing period: through . Source: BeachesMLS; financing snapshot 2026-10-14.
86.7% of the 83 closings with known buyer financing were coded Cash (72 cash purchases). Other reported financing accounted for 13.3% (11 closings).
| Measure | Closings |
|---|---|
| Cash purchases | 72 |
| Other reported financing | 11 |
| Closings with known buyer financing | 83 |
| Unknown or unreported buyer financing | 0 |
| Total closings in this financing snapshot | 83 |
Cash share = closings coded Cash ÷ closings with known buyer financing. Other reported financing is the remaining known category; it can include mortgages and other arrangements. Blank, unknown or conflicting financing is excluded from both percentages and counted separately. These are MLS-reported closings; the financing period above may differ from other tables on this page.
| Horizon | Baseline period | Baseline median $/LSF | Current period | Current median $/LSF | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | 01/01/25–10/14/25 | $998 73 usable sales | 01/01/26–10/14/26 | $1,243 70 usable sales | +24.5% 73 baseline and 70 current usable sales |
| 5 years | 01/01/21–10/14/21 | $583 130 usable sales | 01/01/26–10/14/26 | $1,243 70 usable sales | +113.2% 130 baseline and 70 current usable sales |
| 10 years | 01/01/16–10/14/16 | $319 64 usable sales | 01/01/26–10/14/26 | $1,243 70 usable sales | +289.6% 64 baseline and 70 current usable sales |
Each change requires at least ten usable observations in both matched periods. These transaction-level medians compare different sold cohorts and do not measure same-home appreciation.
6 closings in August 2026 and 6 in July 2026: 0 difference in closings. Small monthly counts do not establish a broad change in demand.
| Month | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2026 | 6 | $4,650,000 6 usable sales | $1,270 6 usable sales | 128 days 6 usable sales |
| July 2026 | 6 | $4,980,000 6 usable sales | $1,625 6 usable sales | 80.5 days 6 usable sales |
| August 2025 | 7 | $2,150,000 7 usable sales | $886 7 usable sales | 45.5 days 6 usable sales |
Median $/living SF change from July 2026: Limited comparison 6 baseline and 6 current usable sales. Sample rules.
| Year | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time | Year-on-year $/living SF change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 91 | $640,000 91 usable sales | $330 91 usable sales | 35 days 91 usable sales | Baseline |
| 2018 | 83 | $850,000 83 usable sales | $357 83 usable sales | 62.5 days 82 usable sales | +8.2% 91 baseline and 83 current usable sales |
| 2019 | 102 | $825,000 102 usable sales | $367 102 usable sales | 74 days 101 usable sales | +3% 83 baseline and 102 current usable sales |
| 2020 | 122 | $1,212,500 122 usable sales | $440 122 usable sales | 39.5 days 120 usable sales | +19.7% 102 baseline and 122 current usable sales |
| 2021 | 155 | $1,480,000 155 usable sales | $611 155 usable sales | 15.5 days 152 usable sales | +39% 122 baseline and 155 current usable sales |
| 2022 | 89 | $2,350,000 89 usable sales | $917 89 usable sales | 19.5 days 88 usable sales | +50.2% 155 baseline and 89 current usable sales |
| 2023 | 50 | $1,832,500 50 usable sales | $898 50 usable sales | 39 days 49 usable sales | -2.1% 89 baseline and 50 current usable sales |
| 2024 | 68 | $2,595,300 68 usable sales | $923 68 usable sales | 55.5 days 66 usable sales | +2.8% 50 baseline and 68 current usable sales |
| 2025 | 87 | $2,295,000 87 usable sales | $1,019 86 usable sales | 62 days 85 usable sales | +10.4% 68 baseline and 86 current usable sales |
| 2026 YTD | 70 | $3,225,000 70 usable sales | $1,243 70 usable sales | 76 days 69 usable sales | +21.9% 86 baseline and 70 current usable sales |
Changes describe different sold cohorts. They are not repeat-sales appreciation, and 2026 is an incomplete year.
Related market context
These reports provide related context. Each defines its own geography, property types and reporting dates; the links do not make the markets interchangeable.
Check this separate waterfront cohort’s geographic coverage, housing types and water-feature evidence before comparing its figures.
Review Northwood sales, inventory and housing-type evidence as a separate community market.
See why housing type, location and the selected sales change the meaning of a market median.
Read the regional employment context alongside local housing evidence; job growth alone does not establish a property’s value.
Paste this request into an AI assistant that can read websites. It will use the East of Olive community page to create a report around your interests using only this website’s published content.
Create a report about East of Olive using https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/east-of-olive. Use only DavidAbernathy.com; do not search the wider web or open external links. Use preferences I have already given. If report length or priorities are missing, ask once in one message: “Would you like a brief overview or a detailed report, and what matters most to you?” After my answer, write the report directly. Organize it as Lifestyle → Market → Properties. Use the site’s published figures and dates. Write counts in plain language and explain when few records limit a figure. Omit information the site does not provide. If you cannot read the page, ask me to paste its text. Put David Abernathy’s credit, the preparation date and source-page link in the footer only.
For another community or waterfront area, open its page on DavidAbernathy.com and copy that page’s own report prompt. Its instructions reflect the property setting and the evidence available there.
Create a polished, standalone report about East of Olive using https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/east-of-olive. The reader may never have visited the website. Write as a knowledgeable real estate agent introducing the community, its strengths and how it could fit a household’s life. USE ONLY DAVIDABERNATHY.COM Use only https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/east-of-olive, relevant linked community reports, methodology and buyer guidance on DavidAbernathy.com (davidabernathy.com or www.davidabernathy.com). Read those pages and these report instructions. Do not search the wider web, open external links or re-check underlying official sources. Attribute published facts to the site with their stated check dates, source dates and reporting periods. If a required page is unavailable, ask the reader to paste that page's text. Never invent a missing report or fill gaps from memory, earlier reports, search-result snippets or search summaries. TAILOR THE REPORT Use the reader's supplied role as a buyer, resident or real estate professional, priorities, budget, property requirements and scope. If report length is not given, ask whether they want a brief overview or a longer detailed report. Combine that choice with only useful missing preferences in at most one initial message. Do not require every intake field or repeat supplied answers. Possible priorities include everyday convenience, recreation, family and guests, dining and social life, space and privacy, price and market conditions, or particular home requirements. Tailor the emphasis to those answers. For a buyer, help them understand the community and make a focused search. For a resident, explain the lifestyle and current market context. For a real estate professional, emphasize supported comparisons, client fit and useful questions. Do not invent personal experience or assume preferences the reader has not given. If no initial question is needed, write the report immediately. After the reader answers, write the report directly. Do not ask for plan approval or confirmation to begin. If optional preferences remain unspecified, proceed without inventing them. FOLLOW THIS ORDER: LIFESTYLE → MARKET → PROPERTIES 1. LIFESTYLE Introduce the community and explain what gives it its appeal. Use the lifestyle section to connect its setting, recreation, gathering places and nearby destinations to practical household use. Cover only the offerings supported for this community. Use the lifestyle information published on DavidAbernathy.com and link that community report beside relevant claims, preserving its information-check date and source attribution. Distinguish community-owned amenities from nearby public facilities, commercial services and voluntary or private memberships. Identify eligibility, access and costs only when verified. Clearly distinguish existing offerings from planned facilities, and preserve any stated project dates. Do not assume golf, clubhouse facilities or amenity access comes with homeownership. Do not invent neighborhood boundaries, school assignments, travel times, association obligations, rental rules, aviation access or equestrian permissions. 2. MARKET Explain buyer choice using active listings as a percentage of total residential properties, when both measures are supported. Include trailing-12-month sales, median sold price, median sold price per living square foot, selling time, months of supply and reported cash purchases where available. Explain what each measure means for the reader. Use a concise annual price chart for perspective when the data supports it. Label partial years, figures based on only a few sales and changing property mix. Community medians are not an individual property valuation or a repeat-sales appreciation measure. Explain supported differences between detached homes, townhouses and other recorded housing types before comparing their prices. Preserve the page’s exact geographic and source-group coverage. Where applicable, state that MLS-reported activity may exclude builder-direct or other off-MLS sales and inventory; do not present it as a complete count of every available home. Avoid unexplained rankings or unsupported market claims. 3. PROPERTIES AND COMMUNITY Describe the residential footprint and supported property types, sizes, lots, setting, condition or renovation considerations. Include the total property count and verified homestead counts and percentages where available. A short owner-mailing overview may include verified state or country destination counts. Mailing destinations must never be presented as owner origins, nationalities, primary residency, unique households or purchase intent. Homestead tax coding does not establish actual occupancy. Use only the local groups and property characteristics published on this page or its relevant linked reports on DavidAbernathy.com. Recommend later property-specific confirmation of association rules, homeownership costs, utility service, restrictions and specialized uses; do not research those answers for this report. FINISH WITH USEFUL NEXT QUESTIONS Offer a short set of visit or search questions tied to the reader’s priorities. Include current association costs and obligations, recreation access, guest arrangements, maintenance responsibilities, new-construction terms and planned-project timing where relevant. For communities with aviation, acreage or equestrian features, ask about the specific property’s access, facilities, rules and permitted uses. Treat unverified answers as questions for the association, builder, relevant authority or agent, not as established facts. EVIDENCE AND DATES Use the published website content you actually read. Preserve each source’s stated update date, reporting period, definitions and the number of usable records behind each measure. Distinguish the date the report is prepared from the dates of its evidence. Use the source dates and periods published on the community page; do not infer an exact MLS file-update date from today’s date, the latest transaction or the date you opened the page. If sources have different cutoffs, keep those differences visible. Do not silently recalculate a different period. Use only the website's published evidence or its page text pasted by the reader. Do not retrieve original MLS or tax files, use other uploaded data or fill gaps from outside sources. Omit optional metrics or details not published on the site. Turn decision-relevant gaps into recommendations within the report for the reader to confirm later with the appropriate professional; do not make that confirmation a prerequisite to writing. Do not invent answers or add routine “not available” rows for optional information. Attribute published facts to DavidAbernathy.com and clearly label any simple calculation from its published figures. Use aggregate community information; do not reproduce private owner identities or addresses. PRESENTATION Write supporting counts in plain language in text, tables and charts, such as “18 sales” or “based on 18 properties”. Use the actual count and type of records behind each figure; sales, listings and properties are different. Avoid statistical symbols, count shorthand and unexplained abbreviations. Explain in everyday language when only a few records or missing data limit a conclusion. Use warm, professional prose that stands on its own. Include a table or chart only when supported and useful for the requested report length. Keep the progression clear: lifestyle first, market second, properties third. Avoid exaggeration, invented personal experience and unsupported fees, capacity, permissions or access guarantees. Return a clearly formatted report in the conversation. Create a file or preview only if the reader requests one. CREDITS — FOOTER ONLY Market analysis by David Abernathy · [actual preparation date] Adapted from the East of Olive community page: https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/east-of-olive. For another community or area, open its exact page on DavidAbernathy.com and copy that page’s own report request or full instructions. Use the destination page’s collection-specific instructions rather than changing only the name and source link in this template.
All residential MLS property types are eligible. Medians require five usable observations, percentage changes ten at each endpoint, and supply at least five sales.
MLS months of supply = Active listings ÷ (trailing-year sales ÷ 12). Each n is the usable count for that metric. A missing figure is not zero. Read the collection rules and metric definitions.
Closed sales: 2025-10-15 through 2026-10-14, inclusive in America/New_York. All 14 MLS exports are treated as the 2026-10-14 refresh. The source operator updates an export only when activity occurs, so an earlier Drive modified time means no activity since that timestamp; it does not make the export incomplete. Exact source timestamps remain visible in each report. Tax file dates are independent.
Source roles: BeachesMLS supplies community membership, listing status, dates, prices, living area, financing and MLS property type. Palm Beach County property-tax records supply residential parcel/property counts, situs fields and county classifications used for street/group tables, housing-stock denominators and availability. Tax data does not classify MLS sales or determine reported sale prices.
All residential MLS property subtypes are retained. These reports use complete development exports; geography follows source membership rather than a city-label filter. Distinctive Communities uses a five-observation median rule, ten-observation change rule and five-sale supply rule.
Source folder inventories did not contain saved boundary polygons, selection queries or a definitive city-label crosswalk. Tax-derived housing stock is an analytical denominator, not a certified unit count or turnover measure. No all-community total or peer rank is presented. Site methodology · David's credentials.
Figures are derived from BeachesMLS records. Property types use MLS classifications. Tax files support the audit and do not determine the reported housing type or sales figures.
This report is built from BeachesMLS listing exports and property-tax records. MLS data supplies community membership, status, dates, prices, living area and property type; tax data independently supports the housing-stock denominator described below and does not classify MLS sales. Source completeness and fingerprints are verified internally, but raw filenames, links, identifiers and fingerprints are not published.
These counts include all statuses and historical years, not just current sales. MLS city labels: Lake Worth Beach: 1; Palm Beach: 4; West Palm Beach: 4269. MLS property types: Condominium: 1; Single Family Residence: 4264; Townhouse: 8; Unspecified: 1.
4274 unique listing keys; 2 repeated closing events collapsed; 0 Closed records without usable dates; 0 future closings excluded; 1 records excluded for missing or sub-$10,000 prices. Conflicting duplicate fields: days: 2. Affected classification rows remain visibly conflicting; affected metric values are withheld.
Tax records contain 3781 rows, 1477 distinct populated parcel IDs and 1477 qualifying residential parcels used for housing-stock availability. Residential vacant lots are included; nonresidential land-use rows are excluded. This analytical denominator is not a certified unit count. Tax city labels: WEST PALM BEACH: 3781.
The previous source update times were 2026-10-13T07:37:27.367Z. Current source dates are verified internally and used to define each report period. Earlier metadata recorded 0 geographic row exclusions across the full file; that filter's complete selection record was unavailable. This release consistently uses full development membership and discloses city labels. Revised market-time samples also exclude conflicting duplicate dates.
| Metric | Before | Audited |
|---|---|---|
| sales | 82 | 83 |
| active | 40 | 41 |
| psf | 1,234.313 | 1,235.465 |
| days | 73 | 71.5 |
| months | 5.854 | 5.928 |
Analysis by David Abernathy, derived from BeachesMLS exports and property-tax records. Aggregate evidence only; licensed listing records and owner information are not republished. Source groups are editorial comparisons, not evidence of buyer cross-shopping.
Housing form, location and individual features can differ from the combined community result. A property analysis can narrow the relevant sales.
Request a private property analysisA CLEARER PERSPECTIVE
Places, People, The research behind the decision