Thinking of selling?
Start with recent sales, current competition and selling pace, then narrow the comparison to your home.
See the market evidenceDistinctive Communities · all residential MLS property types
The local differences, The market evidence, A clearer perspective on your next move
View all 3,837 properties by Parcel ID, with MLS sales and tax records
THE CURRENT PICTURE
Abacoa recorded 231 MLS-reported sales from October 15, 2025 through October 14, 2026, with a median sold price of $715,000 and median sold price per living square foot of $398. Active inventory was 22 listings on October 14, 2026. Recent sales carry Jupiter MLS city labels. Abacoa's 118 single-family closings had a $1,122,500 median sold price, while 112 townhouse closings had a $585,000 median. The community-wide median combines those housing types and one villa sale; it is not a detached-home benchmark. Owners and buyers should compare the same property type before applying the community median. All residential MLS property types are included; the housing mix affects the combined median.
A CLEARER WAY THROUGH THE REPORT
Use the path that fits why you are exploring Abacoa. Every figure links back to its period, sample and source.
Start with recent sales, current competition and selling pace, then narrow the comparison to your home.
See the market evidenceExplore daily life, recreation and the community’s setting, then compare the housing types and homes that fit your priorities.
Explore the communitySales 2025-10-15 through 2026-10-14; Active listings 2026-10-14.
| Community | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time | Active listings | Availability | MLS Months of supply | 1-year comparable $/LSF change | 5-year comparable $/LSF change | 10-year comparable $/LSF change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abacoa | 231 | $715,000 231 usable sales | $398 231 usable sales | 16 days 223 usable sales | 22 | 0.57% 22 / 3,837 | 1.1 231 usable sales closings | +3.2% 160 baseline and 188 current usable sales | +45.5% 218 baseline and 188 current usable sales | +101.8% 245 baseline and 188 current usable sales |
Contract timing
This chart and the findings use this market’s recorded contract dates. The month of contract is different from the month a home was listed.
PurchaseContractDate, full calendar years, Bars show contract counts, not rates; the period totals are 1,475 in 2015–2019 and 1,055 in 2021–2025, The two periods each have at least 30 recorded contracts, 2020 and partial 2026 are excluded| Month | 2015–2019 | 2021–2025 |
|---|---|---|
| January | 112 | 90 |
| February | 122 | 103 |
| March | 131 | 113 |
| April | 175 | 114 |
| May | 149 | 98 |
| June | 154 | 80 |
| July | 126 | 88 |
| August | 136 | 86 |
| September | 97 | 80 |
| October | 114 | 73 |
| November | 86 | 72 |
| December | 73 | 58 |
In Abacoa, 330 of 1,055 recorded contracts in 2021–2025 were signed from February through April (31.3%). April had the most contracts: 114.
February–April accounted for 29.0% of 1,475 contracts in 2015–2019. The later share was 2.3 percentage points higher. This compares different homes over two complete five-year periods; it does not establish the best listing date for an individual property.
In the more recent 2023–2025 window, March led with 61 of 568 contracts. The shift in peak month is a reminder to check current inventory as well as the longer history.
MLS file last updated: September 27, 2026. Contracts are grouped by PurchaseContractDate; 2020 and the partial 2026 year are excluded from the comparisons. All residential property types are included.
Counts use distinct residential tax parcels, including residential lots and redevelopment sites. Each classification separately accounts for all 3,837 properties. Missing or conflicting tax labels remain unassigned. Tax labels can differ from MLS reporting labels; unavailable matches are not zero. Tax housing groups combine townhouses with villas and condos with co-ops. Multifamily parcels, where eligible, count as properties rather than dwelling units.
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| ANDOVER DR | 14 |
| APALACHEE LN | 12 |
| ARKLOW AVE | 15 |
| ARPEICKA LN | 12 |
| ASHFORD AVE | 17 |
| ASHLEY CT | 28 |
| AVALON WAY | 14 |
| AVILA WAY | 2 |
| BANDON LN | 21 |
| BARBADOS DR | 124 |
| BARCELONA DR | 29 |
| BELLEFONTAINE LN | 5 |
| BERMUDA DR | 24 |
| BIG PINE WAY | 13 |
| BILBOA DR | 10 |
| BISHOPWOOD DR | 12 |
| BISMARK LN | 8 |
| BLOWING POINT PL | 12 |
| BONAIRE LN | 5 |
| BOUGAINVILLEA DR | 19 |
| BOURNE DR | 14 |
| CADES BAY AVE | 16 |
| CANTERBURY PL | 9 |
| CARAVELLE DR | 115 |
| CAROLINE DR | 35 |
| CASTRIES DR | 17 |
| CHERRY LAUREL DR | 3 |
| COMMUNITY DR | 357 |
| CORBISON POINT PL | 20 |
| COURTENAY CT | 20 |
| CUPCOY AVE | 10 |
| DAKOTA DR | 124 |
| DANFORTH DR | 4 |
| DATE PALM DR | 14 |
| DAY LILY DR | 12 |
| DUNCOMBE DR | 22 |
| DUNMORE DR | 16 |
| DUVAL ST | 48 |
| EDENBERRY AVE | 36 |
| ELIZABETH ST | 9 |
| ENNIS LN | 37 |
| FARMINGDALE DR | 14 |
| FLORENCE DR | 62 |
| FOXFORD CT | 5 |
| FREDERICK SMALL RD | 95 |
| FREEPORT DR | 6 |
| GALICIA WAY | 5 |
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| GALWAY LN | 4 |
| GEIGER ST | 4 |
| GLENCULLEN CIR | 23 |
| GRANDE CULL WAY | 16 |
| GREENWAY DR | 81 |
| GRENADA DR | 12 |
| HAWTHORN DR | 5 |
| HEMINGWAY DR | 8 |
| HONEYSUCKLE DR | 53 |
| INDIAN CROSSING CIR | 43 |
| IRIS DR | 12 |
| ISLAMORADA DR | 58 |
| JACARANDA DR | 12 |
| JEAGA DR | 137 |
| JESUP LN | 11 |
| JOSEPHINE ST | 14 |
| JUNIPER WAY | 10 |
| KEY LARGO ST | 29 |
| KILLARNEY CT | 8 |
| LAGRANGE WAY | 8 |
| LAMARVILLE DR | 8 |
| LEGARE CT | 36 |
| LIMETREE BAY AVE | 10 |
| LISMORE LN | 18 |
| MACREDDIN PL | 4 |
| MAIN ST | 56 |
| MALLORY BLVD | 116 |
| MARLBERRY CIR | 81 |
| MAYA CAY LN | 12 |
| MEADS BAY LN | 10 |
| MERRIMACK WAY | 8 |
| MIDDLEBURY DR | 25 |
| MIDLETON WAY | 21 |
| MILBRIDGE DR | 33 |
| MORNING DEW CIR | 27 |
| MULLIGAN PL | 29 |
| MURCIA DR | 5 |
| MURRAY CT | 36 |
| NEWCASTLE DR | 19 |
| NEWHAVEN BLVD | 47 |
| OSCEOLA LN | 17 |
| OYSTER POND WAY | 6 |
| PARADISE CIR | 16 |
| PARKSIDE DR | 40 |
| PEABODY DR | 4 |
| POINCIANA DR | 69 |
| POWELL LN | 10 |
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| PRESCOTT DR | 27 |
| PROMENADE WAY | 18 |
| QUEENSLAND LN | 4 |
| RADCLIFFE CT | 32 |
| RAMSEY WAY | 12 |
| REDWOOD DR | 16 |
| RIVINIA DR | 26 |
| ROCKINGHAM RD | 24 |
| SAN REMO DR | 97 |
| SANDY SPIT LN | 6 |
| SANTANDER DR | 14 |
| SANTIAGO DR | 20 |
| SARDINIA CIR | 13 |
| SATIN LEAF DR | 4 |
| SAVANNAH BAY PL | 12 |
| SAVONA DR | 19 |
| SCILLY CAY LN | 10 |
| SEGOVIA WAY | 33 |
| SORIANO DR | 56 |
| ST LUCIA LN | 5 |
| ST LUKES LN | 12 |
| ST MARTIN LN | 5 |
| ST PIERRE WAY | 15 |
| STADIUM DR | 12 |
| SUGAR APPLE WAY | 10 |
| SUNBURY DR | 28 |
| SUNSHINE DR | 40 |
| SWEET BAY CIR | 95 |
| SWEET HILL DR | 18 |
| SYCAMORE DR | 11 |
| TALLOW TRL | 9 |
| TELFAIR DR | 4 |
| TIKI DR | 8 |
| TORCH KEY WAY | 5 |
| TROPICAL DR | 22 |
| TULLAMORE AVE | 2 |
| TURNBRIDGE DR | 60 |
| UNIVERSITY BLVD | 14 |
| VALENCIA BLVD | 16 |
| VENTRY AVE | 5 |
| VILLA BELLA | 10 |
| WATERFORD DR | 46 |
| WENTWORTH CT | 36 |
| WICKLOW LN | 6 |
| WILSHIRE DR | 3 |
| WINDLEY KEY WAY | 11 |
| WYMBERLY DR | 54 |
| Tax city label | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| JUPITER | 3,837 |
| Total | 3,837 |
| Tax development | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| Abacoa | 3,837 |
| Total | 3,837 |
| Tax subdivision | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| Cambridge | 209 |
| Canterbury Place | 317 |
| Charleston Court | 188 |
| Island | 176 |
| Mallory Creek | 581 |
| Martinique | 448 |
| Newhaven | 505 |
| Osceola Woods | 146 |
| San Palermo | 34 |
| Town Center | 280 |
| Tuscany | 446 |
| Valencia | 136 |
| Windsor Park | 371 |
| Total | 3,837 |
| Tax housing group | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| Single Family Residence | 1,834 |
| Townhouse / Villa | 2,003 |
| Total | 3,837 |
Closed sales cover October 15, 2025 through October 14, 2026; Active inventory is dated October 14, 2026. Housing, city and development tables describe the same sales from different angles. Medians require five usable observations.
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings | MLS Months of supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jupiter | 3,837 | 231 | $715,000 231 usable sales | $398 231 usable sales | 22 | 1.1 |
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings | MLS Months of supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family Residence | 1,834 | 118 | $1,122,500 118 usable sales | $524 118 usable sales | 8 | 0.8 |
| Townhouse | 2,003 | 112 | $585,000 112 usable sales | $343 112 usable sales | 14 | 1.5 |
| Villa | 2,003 | 1 | Limited sample 1 usable sale | Limited sample 1 usable sale | 0 | Limited sample 1 usable sale |
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings | MLS Months of supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abacoa | 3,837 | 231 | $715,000 231 usable sales | $398 231 usable sales | 22 | 1.1 |
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings | MLS Months of supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cambridge | 209 | 14 | $790,000 14 usable sales | $400 14 usable sales | 1 | 0.9 |
| Canterbury Place | 317 | 20 | $621,500 20 usable sales | $313 20 usable sales | 3 | 1.8 |
| Charleston Court | 188 | 5 | $520,000 5 usable sales | $323 5 usable sales | 3 | 7.2 |
| Island | 176 | 11 | $1,250,000 11 usable sales | $588 11 usable sales | 0 | 0 |
| Mallory Creek | 581 | 38 | $747,500 38 usable sales | $405 38 usable sales | 2 | 0.6 |
| Martinique | 448 | 20 | $882,500 20 usable sales | $450 20 usable sales | 0 | 0 |
| Newhaven | 505 | 39 | $860,000 39 usable sales | $484 39 usable sales | 4 | 1.2 |
| Osceola Woods | 146 | 10 | $484,500 10 usable sales | $251 10 usable sales | 2 | 2.4 |
| Town Center | 280 | 17 | $499,000 17 usable sales | $283 17 usable sales | 2 | 1.4 |
| Tuscany | 446 | 29 | $747,000 29 usable sales | $422 29 usable sales | 2 | 0.8 |
| Valencia | 136 | 9 | $2,194,660 9 usable sales | $546 9 usable sales | 1 | 1.3 |
| Windsor Park | 371 | 17 | $925,000 17 usable sales | $405 17 usable sales | 1 | 0.7 |
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings | Months of supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Palermo | 34 | 2 | Limited sample 2 usable sales | Limited sample 2 usable sales | 1 | Limited sample 2 usable sales |
Some sources provide only the parent development label. Those rows do not establish separate neighborhoods. Legal plat labels are retained as recorded. Where a finding refers to a low-volume group, its count is in the expandable table immediately above.
Owner mailing footprint · Abacoa
A starting point for considering listing outreach, alongside recent sales and other market evidence.
957 of 3,837 parcels (24.9%) have a recorded mailing address that differs from the property address. These counts describe tax-mail destinations, not residency, unique households or where buyers moved from.
See the combined Distinctive Communities state and county totals →
86 address comparisons need review. 45 have unavailable or confidential mailing details; 41 have possible same-property street or unit variations. They are included in the parcel total and excluded from both the same-property and off-property counts below.
Off-property addresses only · one count per parcel
| County / state | Parcels | Tax records |
|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 417 | View records ↗ |
| Maricopa CountyArizonaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 49 | — |
| Suffolk CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 32 | View records ↗ |
| Martin CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 26 | View records ↗ |
| Nassau CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 20 | View records ↗ |
| Miami-Dade CountyFlorida | 13 | — |
| Fairfield CountyConnecticutExplore Connecticut parcel intelligence → | 11 | Town assessors ↗ |
907 of 942 U.S. off-property mailings have a county assignment: 871 address matches and 36 ZIP-based estimates. 35 remain unresolved. Rankings include the estimates and can change as unresolved addresses are matched.
942 off-property U.S. addresses
15 international mailings are excluded from U.S. state and county rankings.
Search Palm Beach County Property Appraiser ↗Search Palm Beach County tax bills ↗Open a state to see its counties. State totals include unresolved counties. Each number counts parcels with off-property mailing addresses.
County unresolved: 20.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suffolk CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 32 | 30 | 2 | View records ↗ |
| Nassau CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 20 | 19 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Westchester CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 7 | 7 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| New York County (Manhattan)New YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 4 | 4 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Erie CountyNew York | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| Monroe CountyNew York | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Queens CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Rockland CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Steuben CountyNew York | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Albany CountyNew York | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Clinton CountyNew York | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Kings CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Onondaga CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Orange CountyNew York | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Saratoga CountyNew York | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Somerset CountyNew Jersey | 11 | 10 | 1 | — |
| Bergen CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 10 | 9 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Monmouth CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 7 | 6 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Mercer CountyNew Jersey | 6 | 6 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Passaic CountyNew Jersey | 6 | 6 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Ocean CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 5 | 5 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Atlantic CountyNew Jersey | 4 | 3 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Essex CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 4 | 4 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Burlington CountyNew Jersey | 3 | 3 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Cape May CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 3 | 3 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Middlesex CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 3 | 2 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Morris CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 3 | 3 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Union CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 3 | 3 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maricopa CountyArizonaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 49 | 47 | 2 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montgomery CountyPennsylvaniaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 7 | 5 | 2 | View records ↗ |
| Allegheny CountyPennsylvania | 5 | 5 | 0 | — |
| Bucks CountyPennsylvania | 5 | 5 | 0 | — |
| Butler CountyPennsylvania | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Chester CountyPennsylvania | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Delaware CountyPennsylvania | 2 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Philadelphia CountyPennsylvaniaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Lackawanna CountyPennsylvania | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Lancaster CountyPennsylvania | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Luzerne CountyPennsylvania | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 1.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Middlesex CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 10 | 9 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Barnstable CountyMassachusetts | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| Essex CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| Norfolk CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 3 | 3 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Berkshire CountyMassachusetts | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Bristol CountyMassachusetts | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Suffolk CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Worcester CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fairfield CountyConnecticutExplore Connecticut parcel intelligence → | 11 | 11 | 0 | Town assessors ↗ |
| New Haven CountyConnecticutExplore Connecticut parcel intelligence → | 7 | 7 | 0 | Town assessors ↗ |
| Hartford CountyConnecticut | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Litchfield CountyConnecticutExplore Connecticut parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | Town assessors ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cook CountyIllinoisExplore county parcel intelligence → | 5 | 5 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| DuPage CountyIllinois | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| Kane CountyIllinois | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Madison CountyIllinois | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Sangamon CountyIllinois | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| St. Clair CountyIllinois | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Will CountyIllinois | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Woodford CountyIllinois | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orange CountyCalifornia | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| San Diego CountyCaliforniaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| Los Angeles CountyCaliforniaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| Contra Costa CountyCalifornia | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Napa CountyCalifornia | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cuyahoga CountyOhio | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Defiance CountyOhio | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Hamilton CountyOhio | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Medina CountyOhio | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 10.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Louis CountyMissouri | 6 | 6 | 0 | — |
| Greene CountyMissouri | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Cole CountyMissouri | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| St. Charles CountyMissouri | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Stone CountyMissouri | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montgomery CountyMarylandExplore county parcel intelligence → | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| Anne Arundel CountyMaryland | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Frederick CountyMaryland | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Howard CountyMaryland | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Talbot CountyMaryland | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Wicomico CountyMaryland | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williamson CountyTennessee | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Davidson CountyTennessee | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Knox CountyTennessee | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Rutherford CountyTennessee | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Shelby CountyTennessee | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Sumner CountyTennessee | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Durham CountyNorth Carolina | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Mecklenburg CountyNorth CarolinaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| New Hanover CountyNorth Carolina | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Wake CountyNorth Carolina | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kent CountyRhode Island | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| Washington CountyRhode Island | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Bristol CountyRhode Island | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas CountyColorado | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Boulder CountyColorado | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Broomfield CountyColorado | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Jefferson CountyColorado | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carroll CountyGeorgia | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Cobb CountyGeorgia | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| DeKalb CountyGeorgia | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Fulton CountyGeorgiaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 1.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macomb CountyMichigan | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| Emmet CountyMichigan | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Oakland CountyMichiganExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fairfax CountyVirginia | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| Chesterfield CountyVirginia | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Spotsylvania CountyVirginia | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allen CountyIndiana | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Boone CountyIndiana | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Hamilton CountyIndiana | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Kosciusko CountyIndiana | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harris CountyTexasExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Grayson CountyTexas | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Tarrant CountyTexas | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| King CountyWashington | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Pierce CountyWashington | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Snohomish CountyWashington | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson CountyKansas | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Sedgwick CountyKansas | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dakota CountyMinnesota | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Hennepin CountyMinnesota | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Traverse CountyMinnesota | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hillsborough CountyNew Hampshire | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Rockingham CountyNew Hampshire | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 1.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kent CountyDelaware | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| New Castle CountyDelaware | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| District of ColumbiaDistrict of ColumbiaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ada CountyIdaho | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Kootenai CountyIdaho | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washoe CountyNevada | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salt Lake CountyUtah | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 1.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallas CountyIowa | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kennebec CountyMaine | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison CountyMississippi | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santa Fe CountyNew Mexico | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| McIntosh CountyOklahoma | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clackamas CountyOregon | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
No county assignments are available for this scope.
County unresolved: 1.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waukesha CountyWisconsin | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
Prepared 2026-10-12 from the tax snapshots underlying the established property directories (source files modified 2026-09-05). These file dates do not establish a tax-roll year. This scope contains 3,837 developed residential parcels and 0 residential vacant lots. Commercial, common-area and agricultural classifications are excluded. Multiple parcels belonging to one owner count separately.
Capitalization, punctuation, common street abbreviations, unit labels and ZIP+4 suffixes are normalized. Recorded legal-unit aliases are used when they identify one parcel at a building; mailing to a different recorded unit remains off-property. Uncertain local street or unit variants and confidential or missing mailing details are withheld from the off-property rankings. A different mailing address elsewhere within the same community can still qualify.
Counties use the U.S. Census Geocoder. If a street cannot be matched, a county is estimated only when its 2020 Census ZIP area falls in a single county and agrees with the mailing state. A ZIP area is an approximation of postal delivery geography; ZIP-based counts are estimates. County boundaries use the 2020 vintage, including Connecticut’s historical counties. Connecticut tax assessments are maintained by towns.
Published figures contain aggregate counts only. A mailing destination can be a home, business, trustee, adviser or post-office box. Unresolved addresses may change the final rankings.
Tax-mail destinations may be personal or second residences, businesses, family offices, trusts, registered agents, attorneys or accountants. These records describe existing ownership as of the source snapshot; they do not establish primary residence, where wealth is held, buyer origin, decision-making authority or purchase intent. Long-held properties and recent purchases both appear in this ownership snapshot.
IRS migration data measures year-to-year tax-filing address changes for a different population and period. It is complementary context, not a count of incoming homebuyers. Neither dataset identifies a qualified buyer or proves future demand.
Combine the ownership mailing footprint with relevant sales, pricing and the home’s specific appeal when considering listing distribution.
Request a listing outreach strategy →| Housing category | Tax-record housing stock | Active listings | Availability | Trailing-year sales | MLS Months of supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All residential | 3,837 | 22 | 0.57% | 231 | 1.1 231 usable sales |
| Single family | 1,834 | 8 | 0.44% | 118 | 0.8 118 usable sales |
| Condominium / cooperative | No matching tax stock | 0 | Unavailable | 0 | Limited sample 0 usable sales |
| Townhome / villa | 2,003 | 14 | 0.7% | 113 | 1.5 113 usable sales |
Availability is Active listings ÷ tax-record housing stock. Property-type MLS months of supply is shown only with at least five sales. The overall row uses unique residential parcels and is not the sum of MLS listing counts.
Buyer-financing period: through . Source: BeachesMLS; financing snapshot 2026-10-14.
44.2% of the 231 closings with known buyer financing were coded Cash (102 cash purchases). Other reported financing accounted for 55.8% (129 closings).
| Measure | Closings |
|---|---|
| Cash purchases | 102 |
| Other reported financing | 129 |
| Closings with known buyer financing | 231 |
| Unknown or unreported buyer financing | 0 |
| Total closings in this financing snapshot | 231 |
Cash share = closings coded Cash ÷ closings with known buyer financing. Other reported financing is the remaining known category; it can include mortgages and other arrangements. Blank, unknown or conflicting financing is excluded from both percentages and counted separately. These are MLS-reported closings; the financing period above may differ from other tables on this page.
| Horizon | Baseline period | Baseline median $/LSF | Current period | Current median $/LSF | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | 01/01/25–10/14/25 | $392 160 usable sales | 01/01/26–10/14/26 | $404 188 usable sales | +3.2% 160 baseline and 188 current usable sales |
| 5 years | 01/01/21–10/14/21 | $278 218 usable sales | 01/01/26–10/14/26 | $404 188 usable sales | +45.5% 218 baseline and 188 current usable sales |
| 10 years | 01/01/16–10/14/16 | $200 245 usable sales | 01/01/26–10/14/26 | $404 188 usable sales | +101.8% 245 baseline and 188 current usable sales |
Each change requires at least ten usable observations in both matched periods. These transaction-level medians compare different sold cohorts and do not measure same-home appreciation.
15 closings in August 2026 and 25 in July 2026: 10 fewer closings. Small monthly counts do not establish a broad change in demand.
| Month | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2026 | 15 | $685,000 15 usable sales | $523 15 usable sales | 6.5 days 14 usable sales |
| July 2026 | 25 | $995,000 25 usable sales | $454 25 usable sales | 23.5 days 24 usable sales |
| August 2025 | 18 | $592,500 18 usable sales | $334 18 usable sales | 59.5 days 18 usable sales |
Median $/living SF change from July 2026: +15.4% 25 baseline and 15 current usable sales. Sample rules.
| Year | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time | Year-on-year $/living SF change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 264 | $398,250 264 usable sales | $209 264 usable sales | 23 days 257 usable sales | Baseline |
| 2018 | 306 | $402,500 306 usable sales | $222 304 usable sales | 17 days 303 usable sales | +6.1% 264 baseline and 304 current usable sales |
| 2019 | 296 | $415,000 296 usable sales | $223 296 usable sales | 23.5 days 280 usable sales | +0.6% 304 baseline and 296 current usable sales |
| 2020 | 269 | $440,000 269 usable sales | $237 269 usable sales | 11 days 264 usable sales | +6.4% 296 baseline and 269 current usable sales |
| 2021 | 269 | $504,000 269 usable sales | $287 269 usable sales | 5 days 265 usable sales | +21.1% 269 baseline and 269 current usable sales |
| 2022 | 219 | $660,000 219 usable sales | $373 219 usable sales | 6 days 216 usable sales | +30% 269 baseline and 219 current usable sales |
| 2023 | 198 | $800,000 198 usable sales | $413 198 usable sales | 18 days 197 usable sales | +10.6% 219 baseline and 198 current usable sales |
| 2024 | 163 | $869,900 163 usable sales | $412 163 usable sales | 28 days 161 usable sales | -0.2% 198 baseline and 163 current usable sales |
| 2025 | 203 | $700,000 203 usable sales | $386 203 usable sales | 32 days 198 usable sales | -6.3% 163 baseline and 203 current usable sales |
| 2026 YTD | 188 | $735,000 188 usable sales | $404 188 usable sales | 15 days 182 usable sales | +4.8% 203 baseline and 188 current usable sales |
Changes describe different sold cohorts. They are not repeat-sales appreciation, and 2026 is an incomplete year.
Related market context
These reports provide related context. Each defines its own geography, property types and reporting dates; the links do not make the markets interchangeable.
Review Alton sales, inventory and housing-type evidence as a separate community market.
Explore Jupiter-area wide-water sales, housing types and MLS city labels. This is a separate waterfront cohort, not a total for all Jupiter homes.
See why housing type, location and the selected sales change the meaning of a market median.
Read the regional employment context alongside local housing evidence; job growth alone does not establish a property’s value.
Paste this request into an AI assistant that can read websites. It will use the Abacoa community page to create a report around your interests using only this website’s published content.
Create a report about Abacoa using https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/abacoa. Use only DavidAbernathy.com; do not search the wider web or open external links. Use preferences I have already given. If report length or priorities are missing, ask once in one message: “Would you like a brief overview or a detailed report, and what matters most to you?” After my answer, write the report directly. Organize it as Lifestyle → Market → Properties. Use the site’s published figures and dates. Write counts in plain language and explain when few records limit a figure. Omit information the site does not provide. If you cannot read the page, ask me to paste its text. Put David Abernathy’s credit, the preparation date and source-page link in the footer only.
For another community or waterfront area, open its page on DavidAbernathy.com and copy that page’s own report prompt. Its instructions reflect the property setting and the evidence available there.
Create a polished, standalone report about Abacoa using https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/abacoa. The reader may never have visited the website. Write as a knowledgeable real estate agent introducing the community, its strengths and how it could fit a household’s life. USE ONLY DAVIDABERNATHY.COM Use only https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/abacoa, relevant linked community reports, methodology and buyer guidance on DavidAbernathy.com (davidabernathy.com or www.davidabernathy.com). Read those pages and these report instructions. Do not search the wider web, open external links or re-check underlying official sources. Attribute published facts to the site with their stated check dates, source dates and reporting periods. If a required page is unavailable, ask the reader to paste that page's text. Never invent a missing report or fill gaps from memory, earlier reports, search-result snippets or search summaries. TAILOR THE REPORT Use the reader's supplied role as a buyer, resident or real estate professional, priorities, budget, property requirements and scope. If report length is not given, ask whether they want a brief overview or a longer detailed report. Combine that choice with only useful missing preferences in at most one initial message. Do not require every intake field or repeat supplied answers. Possible priorities include everyday convenience, recreation, family and guests, dining and social life, space and privacy, price and market conditions, or particular home requirements. Tailor the emphasis to those answers. For a buyer, help them understand the community and make a focused search. For a resident, explain the lifestyle and current market context. For a real estate professional, emphasize supported comparisons, client fit and useful questions. Do not invent personal experience or assume preferences the reader has not given. If no initial question is needed, write the report immediately. After the reader answers, write the report directly. Do not ask for plan approval or confirmation to begin. If optional preferences remain unspecified, proceed without inventing them. FOLLOW THIS ORDER: LIFESTYLE → MARKET → PROPERTIES 1. LIFESTYLE Introduce the community and explain what gives it its appeal. Use the lifestyle section to connect its setting, recreation, gathering places and nearby destinations to practical household use. Cover only the offerings supported for this community. Use the lifestyle information published on DavidAbernathy.com and link that community report beside relevant claims, preserving its information-check date and source attribution. Distinguish community-owned amenities from nearby public facilities, commercial services and voluntary or private memberships. Identify eligibility, access and costs only when verified. Clearly distinguish existing offerings from planned facilities, and preserve any stated project dates. Do not assume golf, clubhouse facilities or amenity access comes with homeownership. Do not invent neighborhood boundaries, school assignments, travel times, association obligations, rental rules, aviation access or equestrian permissions. 2. MARKET Explain buyer choice using active listings as a percentage of total residential properties, when both measures are supported. Include trailing-12-month sales, median sold price, median sold price per living square foot, selling time, months of supply and reported cash purchases where available. Explain what each measure means for the reader. Use a concise annual price chart for perspective when the data supports it. Label partial years, figures based on only a few sales and changing property mix. Community medians are not an individual property valuation or a repeat-sales appreciation measure. Explain supported differences between detached homes, townhouses and other recorded housing types before comparing their prices. Preserve the page’s exact geographic and source-group coverage. Where applicable, state that MLS-reported activity may exclude builder-direct or other off-MLS sales and inventory; do not present it as a complete count of every available home. Avoid unexplained rankings or unsupported market claims. 3. PROPERTIES AND COMMUNITY Describe the residential footprint and supported property types, sizes, lots, setting, condition or renovation considerations. Include the total property count and verified homestead counts and percentages where available. A short owner-mailing overview may include verified state or country destination counts. Mailing destinations must never be presented as owner origins, nationalities, primary residency, unique households or purchase intent. Homestead tax coding does not establish actual occupancy. Use only the local groups and property characteristics published on this page or its relevant linked reports on DavidAbernathy.com. Recommend later property-specific confirmation of association rules, homeownership costs, utility service, restrictions and specialized uses; do not research those answers for this report. FINISH WITH USEFUL NEXT QUESTIONS Offer a short set of visit or search questions tied to the reader’s priorities. Include current association costs and obligations, recreation access, guest arrangements, maintenance responsibilities, new-construction terms and planned-project timing where relevant. For communities with aviation, acreage or equestrian features, ask about the specific property’s access, facilities, rules and permitted uses. Treat unverified answers as questions for the association, builder, relevant authority or agent, not as established facts. EVIDENCE AND DATES Use the published website content you actually read. Preserve each source’s stated update date, reporting period, definitions and the number of usable records behind each measure. Distinguish the date the report is prepared from the dates of its evidence. Use the source dates and periods published on the community page; do not infer an exact MLS file-update date from today’s date, the latest transaction or the date you opened the page. If sources have different cutoffs, keep those differences visible. Do not silently recalculate a different period. Use only the website's published evidence or its page text pasted by the reader. Do not retrieve original MLS or tax files, use other uploaded data or fill gaps from outside sources. Omit optional metrics or details not published on the site. Turn decision-relevant gaps into recommendations within the report for the reader to confirm later with the appropriate professional; do not make that confirmation a prerequisite to writing. Do not invent answers or add routine “not available” rows for optional information. Attribute published facts to DavidAbernathy.com and clearly label any simple calculation from its published figures. Use aggregate community information; do not reproduce private owner identities or addresses. PRESENTATION Write supporting counts in plain language in text, tables and charts, such as “18 sales” or “based on 18 properties”. Use the actual count and type of records behind each figure; sales, listings and properties are different. Avoid statistical symbols, count shorthand and unexplained abbreviations. Explain in everyday language when only a few records or missing data limit a conclusion. Use warm, professional prose that stands on its own. Include a table or chart only when supported and useful for the requested report length. Keep the progression clear: lifestyle first, market second, properties third. Avoid exaggeration, invented personal experience and unsupported fees, capacity, permissions or access guarantees. Return a clearly formatted report in the conversation. Create a file or preview only if the reader requests one. CREDITS — FOOTER ONLY Market analysis by David Abernathy · [actual preparation date] Adapted from the Abacoa community page: https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/abacoa. For another community or area, open its exact page on DavidAbernathy.com and copy that page’s own report request or full instructions. Use the destination page’s collection-specific instructions rather than changing only the name and source link in this template.
All residential MLS property types are eligible. Medians require five usable observations, percentage changes ten at each endpoint, and supply at least five sales.
MLS months of supply = Active listings ÷ (trailing-year sales ÷ 12). Each n is the usable count for that metric. A missing figure is not zero. Read the collection rules and metric definitions.
Closed sales: 2025-10-15 through 2026-10-14, inclusive in America/New_York. All 14 MLS exports are treated as the 2026-10-14 refresh. The source operator updates an export only when activity occurs, so an earlier Drive modified time means no activity since that timestamp; it does not make the export incomplete. Exact source timestamps remain visible in each report. Tax file dates are independent.
Source roles: BeachesMLS supplies community membership, listing status, dates, prices, living area, financing and MLS property type. Palm Beach County property-tax records supply residential parcel/property counts, situs fields and county classifications used for street/group tables, housing-stock denominators and availability. Tax data does not classify MLS sales or determine reported sale prices.
All residential MLS property subtypes are retained. These reports use complete development exports; geography follows source membership rather than a city-label filter. Distinctive Communities uses a five-observation median rule, ten-observation change rule and five-sale supply rule.
Source folder inventories did not contain saved boundary polygons, selection queries or a definitive city-label crosswalk. Tax-derived housing stock is an analytical denominator, not a certified unit count or turnover measure. No all-community total or peer rank is presented. Site methodology · David's credentials.
Figures are derived from BeachesMLS records. Property types use MLS classifications. Tax files support the audit and do not determine the reported housing type or sales figures.
This report is built from BeachesMLS listing exports and property-tax records. MLS data supplies community membership, status, dates, prices, living area and property type; tax data independently supports the housing-stock denominator described below and does not classify MLS sales. Source completeness and fingerprints are verified internally, but raw filenames, links, identifiers and fingerprints are not published.
These counts include all statuses and historical years, not just current sales. MLS city labels: Jupiter: 7957; Palm Beach: 1; Palm Beach Gardens: 2; Singer Island: 1; Unspecified: 3. MLS property types: Condominium: 9; Single Family Residence: 3932; Townhouse: 4005; Unspecified: 2; Villa: 16.
7964 unique listing keys; 16 repeated closing events collapsed; 0 Closed records without usable dates; 0 future closings excluded; 4 records excluded for missing or sub-$10,000 prices. Conflicting duplicate fields: days: 13; BuyerFinancing: 2; PropertySubType: 1. Affected classification rows remain visibly conflicting; affected metric values are withheld.
Tax records contain 3838 rows, 3837 distinct populated parcel IDs and 3837 qualifying residential parcels used for housing-stock availability. Residential vacant lots are included; nonresidential land-use rows are excluded. This analytical denominator is not a certified unit count. Tax city labels: JUPITER: 3838.
The previous source update times were 2026-10-13T07:37:36.327Z. Current source dates are verified internally and used to define each report period. Earlier metadata recorded 0 geographic row exclusions across the full file; that filter's complete selection record was unavailable. This release consistently uses full development membership and discloses city labels. Revised market-time samples also exclude conflicting duplicate dates.
| Metric | Before | Audited |
|---|---|---|
| active | 24 | 22 |
| months | 1.247 | 1.143 |
Analysis by David Abernathy, derived from BeachesMLS exports and property-tax records. Aggregate evidence only; licensed listing records and owner information are not republished. Source groups are editorial comparisons, not evidence of buyer cross-shopping.
Housing form, location and individual features can differ from the combined community result. A property analysis can narrow the relevant sales.
Request a private property analysisA CLEARER PERSPECTIVE
Places, People, The research behind the decision