Thinking of selling?
Start with recent sales and competing listings, then narrow the evidence to the right waterfront setting.
See the market evidence
← Waterfront / reports
Waterfront homes · condos and co-ops excluded
Loxahatchee River
The local differences, The market evidence, A clearer perspective on your next move
View all 623 properties by Parcel ID, with MLS sales and tax records
Loxahatchee RiverLocal sales and waterfront evidence
Current coverage
This report currently includes only Palm Beach County properties on the Loxahatchee River. Martin County properties will be added in the future.
THE CURRENT PICTURE
Begin with the evidence
Loxahatchee River recorded 17 MLS-reported sales from October 21, 2025 through October 20, 2026, with a median sold price of $6,250,000 and median sold price per living square foot of $1,484. Active inventory was 14 listings on October 20, 2026. Recent sales carry Jupiter, Tequesta MLS city labels. Inventory represents 9.9 MLS months of supply at the recent sales pace; this is a ratio, not a selling-time forecast. Cash purchases made up 58.8% of closings with known buyer financing (10 cash / 17 known; 0 unknown). Owners and buyers should compare frontage, navigable access and condition before applying the area median. Condos and co-ops are excluded; other residential types remain eligible.
YOUR NEXT MOVE
A move worth waiting for
Considering Loxahatchee River? If you already own a home you love, your next move should offer a compelling fit. I can help you focus on the water setting, boating access and home that fit your plans.
Alongside current listings, I research potential matches beyond listed inventory. A potential match is a starting point; owner interest and property availability must be confirmed.
Explore my seven property-discovery channels ↗A CLEARER WAY THROUGH THE REPORT
Start with your decision
Use the path that fits why you are exploring Loxahatchee River. Every figure links back to its period, sample and source.
Considering a home here?
Explore local water surroundings, recreation and daily life, then compare the homes, boat routes and ownership arrangements that fit your priorities.
Explore the communityWhat the Loxahatchee River data shows
Observations: closed sales 2025-10-21 through 2026-10-20; shared reporting cutoff 2026-10-20.
- The Loxahatchee River group recorded 10 Jupiter-labeled and 7 Tequesta-labeled closings. A Tequesta-only location badge would omit the larger part of the observed cohort. Supporting table
- Recent city labels are 10 Jupiter; 7 Tequesta. Historical source labels and active inventory can cover a different mix, shown separately below. Supporting table
- 14 Active listings against 17 trailing-year closings produce 9.9 MLS months of supply at the shared reporting cutoff 2026-10-20. This is an inventory-to-sales-pace ratio, not a forecast of how long a particular listing will take to sell. Supporting table
Trailing-year sales and current inventory
| Market | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time | Active listings | MLS Months of supply | 2017–2026 YTD $/living SF change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loxahatchee River | 17 | $6,250,000 17 usable sales | $1,484 17 usable sales | 36 days 16 usable sales | 14 | 9.9 17 usable sales | +182.2% 25 usable sales / 14 usable sales |
Contract timing
When contracts are signed in Loxahatchee River
This chart and the findings use this market’s recorded contract dates. The month of contract is different from the month a home was listed.
PurchaseContractDate, full calendar years, Bars show contract counts, not rates; the period totals are 159 in 2015–2019 and 150 in 2021–2025, Both periods meet the 1% display minimum, The 1% display minimum is 6 recorded contracts per period, from 556 distinct residential properties in this area and property-type scope, including verified residential vacant lots, Current tax inventory is used for these historical windows; historical parcel counts are unavailable, This display rule does not establish statistical reliability, 2020 and partial 2026 are excludedMonthly contract counts behind this chart
| Month | 2015–2019 | 2021–2025 |
|---|---|---|
| January | 21 | 18 |
| February | 17 | 17 |
| March | 22 | 20 |
| April | 19 | 11 |
| May | 11 | 16 |
| June | 16 | 17 |
| July | 3 | 10 |
| August | 15 | 6 |
| September | 6 | 6 |
| October | 11 | 12 |
| November | 13 | 7 |
| December | 5 | 10 |
What this market shows
In Loxahatchee River, 48 of 150 recorded contracts in 2021–2025 were signed from February through April (32.0%). March had the most contracts: 20.
February–April accounted for 36.5% of 159 contracts in 2015–2019. The later share was 4.5 percentage points lower. This compares different homes over two complete five-year periods; it does not establish the best listing date for an individual property.
The 2023–2025 window contains 67 contracts.
The 1% display minimum is 6 recorded contracts per period, from 556 distinct residential properties in this area and property-type scope, including verified residential vacant lots. Current tax inventory is used for these historical windows; historical parcel counts are unavailable. This display rule does not establish statistical reliability. Monthly differences can be sensitive to a few transactions and to the mix of properties represented.
MLS file last updated: September 27, 2026. Contracts are grouped by PurchaseContractDate; 2020 and the partial 2026 year are excluded from the comparisons. Condos and co-ops are excluded.
Properties by street and reporting group
Total residential inventory: 556. The same total supplies the 1% reporting threshold, including verified residential lots. Nonresidential, common-area and separately assessed ancillary parcels are excluded; each residential tax parcel counts once. Each classification separately accounts for all 556 parcels. Missing or conflicting tax labels remain unassigned. Tax labels can differ from MLS reporting labels; unavailable matches are not zero. Waterfront counts exclude condominium and co-op tax classifications; eligible townhouse and villa parcels share a tax housing group.
Street
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| 198TH LN | 7 |
| 49TH TER | 5 |
| 52ND WAY | 2 |
| BAMBOO LN | 4 |
| BAY HARBOR RD | 9 |
| CAMP LN | 4 |
| CENTER ST | 16 |
| COUNTRY CLUB CIR | 8 |
| COUNTRY CLUB DR | 12 |
| COUNTY LINE RD | 6 |
| CROWN QUAY LN | 2 |
| DEWITT PL | 1 |
| DOLPHIN CT | 4 |
| DOLPHIN PARK | 2 |
| E RIVERSIDE DR | 14 |
| EASTWINDS CIR | 7 |
| GARDINER LN | 5 |
| GRANDVIEW TER | 4 |
| GULFSTREAM DR | 12 |
| HOLLY LN | 5 |
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| KILLANE DR | 1 |
| LAIRD LN | 2 |
| LANDS END WAY | 11 |
| LEEWARD CIR | 13 |
| LOXAHATCHEE POINTE DR | 3 |
| LOXAHATCHEE RIVER RD | 22 |
| MARLIN DR | 4 |
| PALM POINT DR | 5 |
| PARK ST | 1 |
| PENINSULAR RD | 5 |
| PENN TRL | 2 |
| PENNOCK POINT RD | 57 |
| PERIGON WAY | 5 |
| PINE TREE DR | 14 |
| POINT CIR | 13 |
| POINT DR | 12 |
| POMPANO DR | 5 |
| RIO VISTA DR | 19 |
| RIVER CV | 4 |
| RIVER DR | 69 |
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| RIVER PINES CT | 1 |
| RIVER POINTE WAY | 3 |
| RIVER RD | 4 |
| RIVERSIDE DR | 38 |
| SARGASSO WAY | 1 |
| SHADY LN | 1 |
| STARBOARD WAY | 7 |
| TEQUESTA CIR | 3 |
| TEQUESTA DR | 2 |
| THAYER LN | 1 |
| TOWN HALL AVE | 3 |
| TRADEWINDS CIR | 17 |
| TURNER QUAY | 3 |
| Unassigned / conflicting tax classification | 7 |
| VIA RIO | 8 |
| W RIVERSIDE DR | 34 |
| WHITETAIL LN | 2 |
| WILKINSON LEAS RD | 12 |
| WOODSIDE TRL | 3 |
| YACHT CLUB PL | 10 |
- Total properties
- 556
Tax city label
| Tax city label | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| COUNTY OF PALM BEACH | 2 |
| JUPITER | 347 |
| TEQUESTA | 203 |
| Unassigned / conflicting tax classification | 4 |
| Total | 556 |
Tax development
| Tax development | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| Anchorage Point | 19 |
| Bamboo Point | 2 |
| Bay Harbor | 8 |
| Bermuda Terrace | 34 |
| Camp Lane | 3 |
| Carmel Landing | 2 |
| Center Street | 17 |
| Country Club Circle | 6 |
| Country Club Point | 11 |
| County Line Road | 6 |
| Crown Quay | 2 |
| Eastwinds Landing | 7 |
| Gardiner Lane | 5 |
| Grandview Terrace | 4 |
| Island Country Estates | 3 |
| Jupiter Plantation | 5 |
| Lands End | 20 |
| Leeward Circle | 11 |
| Loxahatchee Pointe | 4 |
| Loxahatchee River | 3 |
| Loxahatchee River Road | 22 |
| North River Plantation | 11 |
| Palm Point | 7 |
| Penn Waterway | 2 |
| Pennock Point | 59 |
| Perigon Point | 5 |
| Rio Vista | 15 |
| River Cove | 3 |
| River Pines | 1 |
| Rivercrest | 13 |
| Riverside On The Loxahatchee | 77 |
| Tequesta Country Club | 116 |
| Turner Quay | 3 |
| Unassigned / conflicting tax classification | 40 |
| Via Rio | 7 |
| Woodside | 3 |
| Total | 556 |
Tax subdivision
| Tax subdivision | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| 25-40-42~ S 100 FT OF N 4 | 1 |
| 35-40-42 | 1 |
| Acreage | 1 |
| Acreage & Unrec | 4 |
| Anchorage Point | 29 |
| BROEDELL LOTS | 1 |
| Bamboo Point | 4 |
| Bay Harbor | 9 |
| Bayview Terrace | 1 |
| COUNTRY CLUB POINT | 3 |
| COUNTY LINE RD | 1 |
| Cabot | 1 |
| Carmel Landing | 2 |
| Country Club Point | 54 |
| Cove Harbor | 1 |
| Crown Quay Lane | 2 |
| Eastwinds Landing | 7 |
| Estates Of Pennock Point | 6 |
| Govt Lt 5 Sub Of Pt | 3 |
| Gulfstream | 1 |
| Island Cove | 3 |
| JOHNSTON SUB | 1 |
| JUPITER | 1 |
| Jupiter | 2 |
| L | 1 |
| Lands End | 8 |
| Little Spring | 2 |
| Loxahatchee Club Prop | 3 |
| Loxahatchee Pointe | 4 |
| Loxahatchee River | 14 |
| Loxahatchee River Road | 1 |
| Loxahatchee riverfront | 1 |
| Marlin Ridge | 1 |
| Moody Carver | 1 |
| N/A | 10 |
| NA | 1 |
| NONE | 4 |
| Neptunes Cove | 3 |
| No | 1 |
| None | 7 |
| North River Plantation | 12 |
| PENNOCK POINT | 1 |
| Palm Point | 5 |
| Palm Point First Add | 2 |
| Peninsular | 1 |
| Peninsular Extension | 1 |
| Penn Waterway | 2 |
| Pennock Place | 8 |
| Pennock Point | 54 |
| Perigon Point Addn | 2 |
| Pinetree | 1 |
| RIVER HAMMOCK | 2 |
| RIVERSIDE | 1 |
| RIVERSIDE ON THE LOX | 1 |
| Rio Vista Of Island Shores | 6 |
| River Cove | 1 |
| River Hammock | 1 |
| River Pines | 1 |
| Rivercrest | 13 |
| Riverside | 9 |
| Riverside Drive | 1 |
| Riverside On The Loxahatchee | 60 |
| S/D OF 35-40-42, GOV LTS 2, 3 & 4 IN | 1 |
| TEQUESTA COUNTRY CLUB | 1 |
| Tequesta | 96 |
| Tequesta Country Club | 1 |
| UNINCORPORATED | 1 |
| UNINCORPORATED JUPITER | 1 |
| Unassigned / conflicting tax classification | 46 |
| Unicorporated | 1 |
| Unincorporated | 1 |
| Unincorporated Jupiter | 1 |
| Unincorporated PBC | 1 |
| Unincorporated area of Jupiter | 1 |
| Via Rio | 7 |
| Via Rio Unrec On Am 90 | 1 |
| Waters of Loxahatchee | 1 |
| Woodside Est | 2 |
| Yacht Club Point Estates | 4 |
| none | 3 |
| Total | 556 |
Tax housing group
| Tax housing group | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| Residential lots | 30 |
| Single Family Residence | 526 |
| Total | 556 |
Geography, housing and waterfront evidence
Loxahatchee River-area homes with Jupiter and Tequesta addresses in MLS. This group overlaps the Jupiter wide-water comparison. Closed sales cover October 21, 2025 through October 20, 2026 in the October 20, 2026 report edition. Active inventory uses the same shared reporting cutoff, October 20, 2026.
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jupiter | 347 | 10 | Unavailable 10 usable sales · residential property count unverified | Unavailable 10 usable sales · residential property count unverified | 10 |
| Tequesta | 203 | 7 | Unavailable 7 usable sales · residential property count unverified | Unavailable 7 usable sales · residential property count unverified | 4 |
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family Residence | 526 | 17 | Unavailable 17 usable sales · residential property count unverified | Unavailable 17 usable sales · residential property count unverified | 14 |
| Recorded classification | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conflicting records | 1 | Unavailable 1 usable sale · single transaction · residential property count unverified | Unavailable 1 usable sale · single transaction · residential property count unverified | 0 |
| Not flagged waterfront | 0 | Unavailable 0 usable sales · residential property count unverified | Unavailable 0 usable sales · residential property count unverified | 1 |
| Other waterfront-coded features | 3 | Unavailable 3 usable sales · residential property count unverified | Unavailable 3 usable sales · residential property count unverified | 0 |
| Waterfront flag + Canal Front feature (no ocean/ICW/river) | 1 | Unavailable 1 usable sale · single transaction · residential property count unverified | Unavailable 1 usable sale · single transaction · residential property count unverified | 1 |
| Waterfront flag + Intracoastal feature (no Ocean Front) | 2 | Unavailable 2 usable sales · residential property count unverified | Unavailable 2 usable sales · residential property count unverified | 2 |
| Waterfront flag + River Front feature (no ocean/ICW) | 10 | Unavailable 10 usable sales · residential property count unverified | Unavailable 10 usable sales · residential property count unverified | 10 |
Owner mailing footprint · Loxahatchee River
Where owners direct their tax mail
A starting point for considering listing outreach, alongside recent sales and other market evidence.
86 of 556 parcels (15.5%) have a recorded mailing address that differs from the property address. These counts describe tax-mail destinations, not residency, unique households or where buyers moved from.
See the combined Waterfront Homes state and county totals →
24 address comparisons need review. 6 have unavailable or confidential mailing details; 18 have possible same-property street or unit variations. They are included in the parcel total and excluded from both the same-property and off-property counts below.
- Residential parcels / lots
- 556
- Mail sent to the property
- 446
- Mail sent elsewhere
- 86
- U.S. states / districts
- 14
Leading mailing counties
Off-property addresses only · one count per parcel
| County / state | Parcels | Tax records |
|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 45 | View records ↗ |
| Essex CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | — |
| Fauquier CountyVirginia | 2 | — |
| Martin CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | View records ↗ |
| New York County (Manhattan)New YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | View records ↗ |
| Westchester CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | View records ↗ |
| Bergen CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | View records ↗ |
71 of 84 U.S. off-property mailings have a county assignment: 68 address matches and 3 ZIP-based estimates. 13 remain unresolved. Rankings include the estimates and can change as unresolved addresses are matched.
Top mailing states
84 off-property U.S. addresses
- Florida59
- Massachusetts5
- New York4
- Michigan2
- New Jersey2
2 international mailings are excluded from U.S. state and county rankings.
Search Palm Beach County Property Appraiser ↗Search Palm Beach County tax bills ↗Full totals by state and county
Open a state to see its counties. State totals include unresolved counties. Each number counts parcels with off-property mailing addresses.
Florida 59 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 45 | 44 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Martin CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Broward CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Marion CountyFlorida | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 10.
Massachusetts 5 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essex CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Hampden CountyMassachusetts | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Middlesex CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Suffolk CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
New York 4 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York County (Manhattan)New YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 1 | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Westchester CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 2 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
Michigan 2 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oakland CountyMichiganExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 1.
New Jersey 2 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bergen CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Essex CountyNew JerseyExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
Pennsylvania 2 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware CountyPennsylvania | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Mercer CountyPennsylvania | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
Virginia 2 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fauquier CountyVirginia | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
Wyoming 2 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheridan CountyWyoming | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 1.
Illinois 1 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cook CountyIllinoisExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
Louisiana 1 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bossier ParishLouisiana | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
Missouri 1 parcels
No county assignments are available for this scope.
County unresolved: 1.
New Hampshire 1 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carroll CountyNew Hampshire | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
Ohio 1 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cuyahoga CountyOhio | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
Texas 1 parcels
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallas CountyTexas | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
Source, scope and address matching
Prepared 2026-10-12 from the tax snapshots underlying the established property directories (source files modified 2026-09-05). These file dates do not establish a tax-roll year. This scope contains 526 developed residential parcels and 30 residential vacant lots. Commercial, common-area and agricultural classifications are excluded. Multiple parcels belonging to one owner count separately.
Waterfront Homes excludes tax-classified condominiums and cooperatives, consistent with the current community reports. Residential vacant lots remain included.
Capitalization, punctuation, common street abbreviations, unit labels and ZIP+4 suffixes are normalized. Recorded legal-unit aliases are used when they identify one parcel at a building; mailing to a different recorded unit remains off-property. Uncertain local street or unit variants and confidential or missing mailing details are withheld from the off-property rankings. A different mailing address elsewhere within the same community can still qualify.
Counties use the U.S. Census Geocoder. If a street cannot be matched, a county is estimated only when its 2020 Census ZIP area falls in a single county and agrees with the mailing state. A ZIP area is an approximation of postal delivery geography; ZIP-based counts are estimates. County boundaries use the 2020 vintage, including Connecticut’s historical counties. Connecticut tax assessments are maintained by towns.
Published figures contain aggregate counts only. A mailing destination can be a home, business, trustee, adviser or post-office box. Unresolved addresses may change the final rankings.
How to use this evidence
Tax-mail destinations may be personal or second residences, businesses, family offices, trusts, registered agents, attorneys or accountants. These records describe existing ownership as of the source snapshot; they do not establish primary residence, where wealth is held, buyer origin, decision-making authority or purchase intent. Long-held properties and recent purchases both appear in this ownership snapshot.
IRS migration data measures year-to-year tax-filing address changes for a different population and period. It is complementary context, not a count of incoming homebuyers. Neither dataset identifies a qualified buyer or proves future demand.
Build an outreach plan around the property
Combine the ownership mailing footprint with relevant sales, pricing and the home’s specific appeal when considering listing distribution.
Request a listing outreach strategy →Buyer financing
Cash and other buyer financing
Buyer-financing period: through . Source: BeachesMLS; financing snapshot 2026-10-20.
58.8% cash share; 10 of 17 closings with known buyer financing were coded Cash. Other reported financing share: 41.2% (7 closings). 17 known financing sales.
| Measure | Closings |
|---|---|
| Cash purchases | 10 |
| Other reported financing | 7 |
| Closings with known buyer financing | 17 |
| Unknown or unreported buyer financing | 0 |
| Total closings in this financing snapshot | 17 |
Cash share = closings coded Cash ÷ closings with known buyer financing. Other reported financing is the remaining known category; it can include mortgages and other arrangements. Blank, unknown or conflicting financing is excluded from both percentages and counted separately. Both percentages require this scope’s 1% display minimum of known-financing sales. Counts remain visible when percentages are unavailable. These are MLS-reported closings; the financing period above may differ from other tables on this page.
Overlap with other market groups
| Other market group | Closings also in this group |
|---|---|
| No matched closing events in the other eight selected groups | 0 |
Matched by normalized parcel number, closing date and price. Missing parcel IDs limit cross-group matching; a zero match count does not certify non-overlapping geographic boundaries.
August 2026: recorded activity
Preserved monthly edition through 2026-09-30. Its original cohort dates, counts and display rules are retained: medians require 1 usable observation; changes require 1 at each endpoint. Fewer than 10 usable observations retain this edition’s small-sample label. Current figures elsewhere use the area’s 1% residential-property display rule.
3 closings in August 2026, compared with 1 in July 2026 (2 more closings). The small counts do not support a percentage-based market-direction claim.
| Month | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2026 | 3 | $3,900,000 3 usable sales · small sample | $1,285 3 usable sales · small sample | 32 days 3 usable sales · small sample |
| July 2026 | 1 | $10,500,000 1 usable sale · single transaction | $1,501 1 usable sale · single transaction | No eligible sales 0 usable sales |
| August 2025 | 1 | $4,100,000 1 usable sale · single transaction | $1,587 1 usable sale · single transaction | 79 days 1 usable sale · single transaction |
Median $/living SF change from July 2026: -14.4% 1 usable sale · single transaction / 3 usable sales · small sample. Calculation and sample rules.
Annual market evidence
| Year | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time | Year-on-year $/living SF change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 25 | $2,115,000 25 usable sales | $539 25 usable sales | 116 days 21 usable sales | Baseline |
| 2018 | 26 | $2,562,500 26 usable sales | $599 26 usable sales | 89 days 25 usable sales | +11.1% 25 usable sales / 26 usable sales |
| 2019 | 29 | $2,240,000 29 usable sales | $619 29 usable sales | 20 days 26 usable sales | +3.4% 26 usable sales / 29 usable sales |
| 2020 | 35 | $2,188,000 35 usable sales | $700 34 usable sales | 53 days 29 usable sales | +13% 29 usable sales / 34 usable sales |
| 2021 | 51 | $3,100,000 51 usable sales | $852 51 usable sales | 14 days 47 usable sales | +21.7% 34 usable sales / 51 usable sales |
| 2022 | 27 | $4,500,000 27 usable sales | $1,261 27 usable sales | 19 days 25 usable sales | +48% 51 usable sales / 27 usable sales |
| 2023 | 16 | $6,272,500 16 usable sales | $1,040 16 usable sales | 22.5 days 14 usable sales | -17.5% 27 usable sales / 16 usable sales |
| 2024 | 16 | $3,350,000 16 usable sales | $1,430 16 usable sales | 23 days 15 usable sales | +37.6% 16 usable sales / 16 usable sales |
| 2025 | 22 | $5,299,500 22 usable sales | $1,370 22 usable sales | 68.5 days 20 usable sales | -4.2% 16 usable sales / 22 usable sales |
| 2026 YTD | 14 | $8,390,000 14 usable sales | $1,522 14 usable sales | 22 days 13 usable sales | +11.1% 22 usable sales / 14 usable sales |
Year-on-year rows compare recorded calendar-year cohorts; 2026 is incomplete. Changes reflect property mix as well as pricing. They are not same-home appreciation.
Related market context
Put this market in context
These reports provide related context. Each defines its own geography, property types and reporting dates; the links do not make the markets interchangeable.
Related market reports
- Jupiter Area Wide-Water market report
Explore Jupiter-area wide-water sales, housing types and MLS city labels. This is a separate waterfront cohort, not a total for all Jupiter homes.
- Tequesta Country Club market report
Read the separate Tequesta Country Club community report in Tequesta, including its housing mix and selected club comparisons.
Analysis and perspective
- Palm Beach County Is Really Five Markets
See why housing type, location and the selected sales change the meaning of a market median.
- Palm Beach County’s expanding high-wage economy
Read the regional employment context alongside local housing evidence; job growth alone does not establish a property’s value.
Before you choose a waterfront home
Connect the waterfront routine you want with the particular home, shoreline and ownership arrangements. A broad market label or attractive water view cannot answer these property-specific questions.
Match the water to your boat
Trace the actual route from the proposed dock to your destinations. Confirm current depth, tides, bridge clearances and opening arrangements for your vessel’s draft, beam and height. Check turning space and exposure at the dock. Compare current charts and navigation notices with a qualified local operator; a regional market report does not certify navigability.
Inspect the dock and shoreline
Request the survey, recorded access documents, permits and maintenance history for the dock, lift and seawall. Obtain appropriate condition assessments and repair estimates. Verify approved use, dimensions, maintenance responsibility and any applicable submerged-land authorization with the relevant authorities and your advisers.
Understand exposure and upkeep
Review the property’s flood mapping, elevation information, drainage, wind protection and insurance quotes. Ask about past water intrusion and the expected care of waterfront structures, exterior finishes and equipment. The shoreline position, home construction and recorded history matter more than an area-wide description.
Confirm the rights and daily fit
Check which waterfront, beach, dock, parking and shared spaces belong to the home or have documented access rights. Review applicable association obligations and guest arrangements. Visit at different times to assess privacy, traffic on the water, outdoor comfort and the household’s land-based routine. For a beachfront property, ask where the Coastal Construction Control Line lies and which approvals apply to intended changes.
These are questions for an individual purchase. Confirm current property documents, physical conditions, approvals, navigation information and insurance terms with the appropriate professionals.
How to read the Waterfront figures
Condos and co-ops are excluded; other residential MLS property types remain eligible. Medians and sales-based comparisons use a minimum computed from 1% of the total residential inventory for the measured area and property type, rounded to the nearest whole transaction (minimum 1) in refreshed analyses. Earlier editions retain their recorded minimum until updated. Residential lots are included in that total. Both historical endpoints must qualify. MLS Months of supply uses the same threshold for trailing-year closings. Counts remain visible; one-sale results are labeled “single transaction.” This is a display rule, not a claim of statistical reliability. Explicitly provisional parent measures may use two documented source scenarios only when both yield the same rounded minimum; the population, inventory-based percentages and unverified subgroups remain unavailable. Other unknown residential totals, missing observations and zero comparison baselines remain unavailable.
MLS months of supply = Active listings ÷ (trailing-year sales ÷ 12). Each n is the usable count for that metric. A missing figure is not zero. Read the collection rules and metric definitions.
Detailed calculation and source notes
Closed-sales period: 2025-10-21 through 2026-10-20, inclusive, in America/New_York. Report edition: 2026-10-20. All current MLS calculations use one reporting cutoff: the newest verified MLS source file across the site. An unchanged older export can mean no new activity; its original modification time is retained internally and does not shorten the reporting period. These MLS figures do not establish every off-MLS sale or late-reported event.
All Waterfront figures exclude MLS subtypes Condominium and Stock Cooperative. Townhouses, villas and other residential subtypes remain eligible. The same exclusions apply to sales, Active inventory, annual history, monthly figures and composition tables. Their boundaries are not independently certified; recorded city labels and housing mixes vary. No combined total, league-table rank or county-wide market estimate is calculated. A city is the recorded MLS label, not a surveyed municipal boundary. “Wide water” is a source-group name, not a measured width. Ocean access alone does not establish direct frontage.
- Closed sales
- Distinct recorded closed events assigned by CloseDate. Duplicate listing keys use the latest recorded modification. Repeated parcel, close-date and price combinations count once; listing key substitutes when parcel is missing. Missing price does not erase an otherwise dated closing count.
- Medians and sample counts
- See the shared sample rule. A median with 1 usable sale equals that transaction’s value. Zero eligible observations display “No eligible sales”; an absent comparison is not 0%. Each supporting count belongs to that metric. Zero counts are real observations; a missing median is not zero.
- Sold price and $/living SF
- Positive finite closing prices; $/living SF is the median of each eligible sale's price divided by its positive living area, not a ratio of group totals.
- Market time
- Elapsed calendar days from OnMarketDate, or ListingContractDate if absent, to PurchaseContractDate. Valid intervals are 0–3,650 days. This is derived market time, not the MLS DOM field. Duplicate closing records with conflicting intervals are excluded from this metric, while the closing remains counted. Conflicting living areas likewise exclude only the $/living SF observation.
- Months of supply
- Active listing count ÷ (trailing-year closings ÷ 12), when the area’s 1% closed-sale display threshold qualifies. With no closings, there is no sales pace and supply is not calculated. Only Active status is included, excluding pending and active-under-contract. Active listings are listing IDs, not a deduplicated count of homes.
- Historical change
- 2017 full-year to 2026 YTD through 2026-10-20, using annual median sold $/living SF and the area’s 1% usable-observation threshold at each endpoint. This spans ten labeled calendar years, not ten elapsed years. It measures different sold cohorts, not repeat-sales appreciation or an individual home's gain. Full-year and partial-year results are not seasonally aligned.
- Monthly comparisons
- The latest complete month is August 2026; the table also shows the preceding month and the same month last year. Counts and absolute count differences remain visible. Preserved monthly edition through 2026-09-30. Its original cohort dates, counts and display rules are retained: medians require 1 usable observation; changes require 1 at each endpoint. Fewer than 10 usable observations retain this edition’s small-sample label. Current figures elsewhere use the area’s 1% residential-property display rule. Changes require a positive baseline. Small samples describe the transactions observed and do not establish a broad market trend.
- Geography, housing and water flags
- Composition tables partition each trailing-year cohort and show Active listings separately. Waterfront features follow an exclusive hierarchy: Ocean Front, then Intracoastal, then River Front, then Canal Front, then other. A false or conflicting flag is not inferred to be waterfront. These features do not certify physical frontage, navigability or dock rights.
Source mapping and physical boundaries remain distinct: export membership has been checked against wf_region_name, but saved boundary polygons, a city-label crosswalk and parcel-level frontage verification were not in the source folders. Conflicting records and historical label anomalies are disclosed. Tax records provide residential parcel/property counts and recorded situs and classification fields; they do not establish occupied-home or dwelling-unit counts, turnover rates, waterfront status or a waterfront premium.
Market analysis and comparison methodology by David Abernathy. Data derived from BeachesMLS and identified public sources. Comparison communities are editorial selections intended to provide market context, not evidence of buyer cross-shopping, and may change over time.
Sources and calculation details
Figures are derived from BeachesMLS records. Property types use MLS classifications. Tax files support the audit and do not determine the reported housing type or sales figures.
Inspect source files, coverage and revisions
Legacy export name: Loxahatchee River. Every MLS row matched that wf_region_name. Display wording reflects the observed source population; the established URL is retained.
Property-type exclusions: 1 trailing-year closing events and 2 Active listings removed; 44 closed events excluded across the full source history. MLS subtypes excluded: Condominium and Stock Cooperative. All headline, historical and monthly metrics use the retained cohort.
This report is built from BeachesMLS listing exports and property-tax records. MLS data supplies geography, property type, waterfront flags, listing status, dates, prices and living area; tax data supplies the residential parcel/property counts, situs fields and county classification groups used in the property-count tables and, where shown, availability context; it does not determine MLS sales, property type or waterfront classification. Source completeness and fingerprints are verified internally, but raw filenames, links, identifiers and fingerprints are not published.
Full-source geography and property-type inventory
These audit counts cover the original unfiltered file, including excluded condos/co-ops, across all statuses and years. They are not the population used in the reported metrics or unique home counts.
MLS city labels: Boynton Beach: 1; Jupiter: 661; Tequesta: 775.
MLS property types: Condominium: 80; Single Family Residence: 1357.
MLS waterfront flags: false: 39; true: 1398.
Observed closing dates: 2000-01-04 through 2026-09-09. Transaction dates do not establish source freshness.
Tax: 767 rows; 575 distinct populated parcel IDs. Rows include repeated building/land records and may include vacant/nonresidential uses; unique parcel counts are not certified home counts. Tax and MLS populations are not assumed equivalent. The collection summary generated 2026-10-20 reports 767 tax rows, matching the supplied tax file. Neither row count is reported as certified housing inventory.
Tax situs city labels (row counts): JUPITER: 380; TEQUESTA: 387.
Deduplication and revision record
1437 unique listing keys; 16 duplicate closing rows collapsed across the full history; 0 closed records without a usable closing date; 0 future-dated closings excluded.
Conflicting duplicate fields: WaterfrontFeatures: 10; days: 14; LivingArea: 1; WaterfrontYN: 1. Affected geography/housing/water rows are labeled conflicting; conflicting market-time and living-area observations are withheld.
In the current reporting period, 1 condominium/co-op closing event(s) are excluded, leaving 17 eligible closings. This explicit filter does not establish the selection logic of earlier reports.
Analysis by David Abernathy from BeachesMLS exports and property-tax records. The tables publish aggregates; licensed listing records and owner information are not republished.
Put your property in the right comparison
The group result supplies context. A property analysis can narrow the evidence to housing type, location and verified water access.
Request a private property analysisA CLEARER PERSPECTIVE
Explore with David
Places, People, The research behind the decision