Thinking of selling?
Start with recent sales and competing listings, then narrow the evidence to the right waterfront setting.
See the market evidenceWaterfront homes · condos and co-ops excluded
The local differences, The market evidence, A clearer perspective on your next move
View all 176 properties by Parcel ID, with MLS sales and tax records
THE CURRENT PICTURE
Boca Raton Mainland – West of ICW recorded 6 MLS-reported sales from October 15, 2025 through October 14, 2026, with a median sold price of $14,000,000 and median sold price per living square foot of $1,972. Active inventory was 5 listings in the October 14, 2026 edition; MLS file last updated October 12, 2026. Recent sales carry Boca Raton MLS city labels. Inventory represents 10 MLS months of supply at the recent sales pace; this is a ratio, not a selling-time forecast. Cash purchases made up 66.7% of 6 closings with known buyer financing. Owners and buyers should check individual comparables before drawing conclusions from this small sample. Condos and co-ops are excluded; other residential types remain eligible. Fewer than ten sales make this a small sample.
A CLEARER WAY THROUGH THE REPORT
Use the path that fits why you are exploring Boca Raton Mainland – West of ICW. Every figure links back to its period, sample and source.
Start with recent sales and competing listings, then narrow the evidence to the right waterfront setting.
See the market evidenceExplore local water surroundings, recreation and daily life, then compare the homes, boat routes and ownership arrangements that fit your priorities.
Explore the communityObservations: closed sales 2025-10-15 through 2026-10-14; MLS file last updated 2026-10-12.
| Market | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time | Active listings | MLS Months of supply | 2017–2026 YTD $/living SF change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boca Raton Mainland – West of ICW | 6 | $14,000,000 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | $1,972 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | 7.5 days 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | 5 | 10 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | +165.8% 11 baseline and 6 current usable sales · small-sample comparison |
Contract timing
This chart and the findings use this market’s recorded contract dates. The month of contract is different from the month a home was listed.
PurchaseContractDate, full calendar years, Bars show contract counts, not rates; the period totals are 60 in 2015–2019 and 41 in 2021–2025, The two periods each have at least 30 recorded contracts, 2020 and partial 2026 are excluded| Month | 2015–2019 | 2021–2025 |
|---|---|---|
| January | 7 | 3 |
| February | 3 | 4 |
| March | 7 | 6 |
| April | 2 | 8 |
| May | 7 | 6 |
| June | 4 | 2 |
| July | 5 | 0 |
| August | 4 | 3 |
| September | 8 | 3 |
| October | 5 | 0 |
| November | 6 | 4 |
| December | 2 | 2 |
In Boca Raton Mainland – West of ICW, 18 of 41 recorded contracts in 2021–2025 were signed from February through April (43.9%). April had the most contracts: 8.
February–April accounted for 20.0% of 60 contracts in 2015–2019. The later share was 23.9 percentage points higher. This compares different homes over two complete five-year periods; it does not establish the best listing date for an individual property.
With 41 contracts across five years, monthly differences are especially sensitive to a few transactions.
MLS file last updated: September 24, 2026. Contracts are grouped by PurchaseContractDate; 2020 and the partial 2026 year are excluded from the comparisons. Condos and co-ops are excluded.
Counts use distinct residential tax parcels, including residential lots and redevelopment sites. Each classification separately accounts for all 161 properties. Missing or conflicting tax labels remain unassigned. Tax labels can differ from MLS reporting labels; unavailable matches are not zero. Waterfront counts exclude condominium and co-op tax classifications; eligible townhouse and villa parcels share a tax housing group. Multifamily parcels, where eligible, count as properties rather than dwelling units.
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| 32ND ST | 1 |
| 33RD ST | 2 |
| 35TH ST | 3 |
| 36TH ST | 2 |
| 37TH ST | 2 |
| 39TH ST | 3 |
| 4TH LN | 3 |
| 5TH AVE | 11 |
| 8TH AVE | 1 |
| 8TH DR | 17 |
| ALEXANDER PALM RD | 14 |
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| APPLEBY ST | 2 |
| BERKELEY ST | 3 |
| COASTAL DR | 5 |
| COVENTRY ST | 3 |
| DOVER ST | 2 |
| EGRET POINT CIR | 3 |
| ENFIELD ST | 2 |
| FORSYTH ST | 2 |
| GLOUCHESTER ST | 2 |
| GOLDEN HARBOUR DR | 12 |
| HARBOUR DR | 9 |
| Street | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| HAVANA DR | 2 |
| LILAC DR | 1 |
| MARINE DR | 2 |
| MAYA PALM DR | 6 |
| MULBERRY DR | 2 |
| NAFA DR | 2 |
| ORCHID BAY DR | 1 |
| ORCHID BAY TER | 6 |
| ROYAL PALM WAY | 29 |
| SILVER LN | 6 |
| Tax city label | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| BOCA RATON | 161 |
| Total | 161 |
| Tax development | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| 5th Avenue | 5 |
| Bel Marra | 12 |
| Blue Inlet | 2 |
| Boca Bay Colony | 6 |
| Boca Harbour | 18 |
| Boca Keys | 3 |
| Caribbean Keys | 7 |
| Dingman Acres | 2 |
| Golden Harbour | 17 |
| Harbour East | 10 |
| Kinney & Gates | 5 |
| Lake Rogers Isle | 13 |
| Left Bank Estates | 3 |
| Royal Palm Yacht & Country Club | 49 |
| Sanctuary | 3 |
| Tropic Isle | 6 |
| Total | 161 |
| Tax subdivision | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| 5th Avenue | 5 |
| Bel Marra | 12 |
| Blue Inlet | 2 |
| Boca Bay Colony | 6 |
| Boca Harbour | 1 |
| Boca Harbour Island | 17 |
| Boca Keys | 3 |
| Caribbean Keys | 7 |
| Dingman Acres | 2 |
| Golden Harbour | 17 |
| Harbour East | 10 |
| Kinney & Gates | 5 |
| Lake Rogers Isle | 13 |
| Left Bank Estates | 3 |
| Royal Palm Yacht & Country Club | 49 |
| Sanctuary | 3 |
| Tropic Isle | 6 |
| Total | 161 |
| Tax housing group | Properties (tax records) |
|---|---|
| Single Family Residence | 161 |
| Total | 161 |
Boca Raton mainland waterfront areas west of the Intracoastal Waterway. All recent sales were single-family homes. Closed sales cover October 15, 2025 through October 14, 2026 in the October 14, 2026 report edition. Active inventory uses the MLS file last updated October 12, 2026.
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boca Raton | 161 | 6 | $14,000,000 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | $1,972 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | 5 |
| Recorded classification | Properties (tax records) | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family Residence | 161 | 6 | $14,000,000 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | $1,972 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | 5 |
| Recorded classification | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Active listings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waterfront flag + Canal Front feature (no ocean/ICW/river) | 0 | No eligible sales 0 usable sales | No eligible sales 0 usable sales | 1 |
| Waterfront flag + Intracoastal feature (no Ocean Front) | 6 | $14,000,000 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | $1,972 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | 4 |
Owner mailing footprint · Boca Raton Mainland – West of ICW
A starting point for considering listing outreach, alongside recent sales and other market evidence.
34 of 176 parcels (19.3%) have a recorded mailing address that differs from the property address. These counts describe tax-mail destinations, not residency, unique households or where buyers moved from.
See the combined Waterfront Homes state and county totals →
1 address comparisons need review. 0 have unavailable or confidential mailing details; 1 have possible same-property street or unit variations. They are included in the parcel total and excluded from both the same-property and off-property counts below.
Off-property addresses only · one count per parcel
| County / state | Parcels | Tax records |
|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 19 | View records ↗ |
| Broward CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | View records ↗ |
| Allegheny CountyPennsylvania | 1 | — |
| Cook CountyIllinoisExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | View records ↗ |
| Douglas CountyNebraska | 1 | — |
| Georgetown CountySouth Carolina | 1 | — |
| Hillsborough CountyNew Hampshire | 1 | — |
30 of 32 U.S. off-property mailings have a county assignment: 26 address matches and 4 ZIP-based estimates. 2 remain unresolved. Rankings include the estimates and can change as unresolved addresses are matched.
32 off-property U.S. addresses
2 international mailings are excluded from U.S. state and county rankings.
Search Palm Beach County Property Appraiser ↗Search Palm Beach County tax bills ↗Open a state to see its counties. State totals include unresolved counties. Each number counts parcels with off-property mailing addresses.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 19 | 19 | 0 | View records ↗ |
| Broward CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 2 | 0 | 2 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 1.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suffolk CountyMassachusettsExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
County unresolved: 1.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allegheny CountyPennsylvania | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Montgomery CountyPennsylvaniaExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 0 | 1 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sussex CountyDelaware | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cook CountyIllinoisExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas CountyNebraska | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hillsborough CountyNew Hampshire | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suffolk CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence → | 1 | 1 | 0 | View records ↗ |
County unresolved: 0.
| County / state | Parcels | Address matched | ZIP based | Tax records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgetown CountySouth Carolina | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
County unresolved: 0.
Prepared 2026-10-12 from the tax snapshots underlying the established property directories (source files modified 2026-09-05). These file dates do not establish a tax-roll year. This scope contains 161 developed residential parcels and 15 residential vacant lots. Commercial, common-area and agricultural classifications are excluded. Multiple parcels belonging to one owner count separately.
Waterfront Homes excludes tax-classified condominiums and cooperatives, consistent with the current community reports. Residential vacant lots remain included.
Capitalization, punctuation, common street abbreviations, unit labels and ZIP+4 suffixes are normalized. Recorded legal-unit aliases are used when they identify one parcel at a building; mailing to a different recorded unit remains off-property. Uncertain local street or unit variants and confidential or missing mailing details are withheld from the off-property rankings. A different mailing address elsewhere within the same community can still qualify.
Counties use the U.S. Census Geocoder. If a street cannot be matched, a county is estimated only when its 2020 Census ZIP area falls in a single county and agrees with the mailing state. A ZIP area is an approximation of postal delivery geography; ZIP-based counts are estimates. County boundaries use the 2020 vintage, including Connecticut’s historical counties. Connecticut tax assessments are maintained by towns.
Published figures contain aggregate counts only. A mailing destination can be a home, business, trustee, adviser or post-office box. Unresolved addresses may change the final rankings.
Tax-mail destinations may be personal or second residences, businesses, family offices, trusts, registered agents, attorneys or accountants. These records describe existing ownership as of the source snapshot; they do not establish primary residence, where wealth is held, buyer origin, decision-making authority or purchase intent. Long-held properties and recent purchases both appear in this ownership snapshot.
IRS migration data measures year-to-year tax-filing address changes for a different population and period. It is complementary context, not a count of incoming homebuyers. Neither dataset identifies a qualified buyer or proves future demand.
Combine the ownership mailing footprint with relevant sales, pricing and the home’s specific appeal when considering listing distribution.
Request a listing outreach strategy →Buyer-financing period: through . Source: BeachesMLS; financing snapshot 2026-10-14.
66.7% of the 6 closings with known buyer financing were coded Cash (4 cash purchases). Other reported financing accounted for 33.3% (2 closings). Small sample: fewer than 10 known financing observations.
| Measure | Closings |
|---|---|
| Cash purchases | 4 |
| Other reported financing | 2 |
| Closings with known buyer financing | 6 |
| Unknown or unreported buyer financing | 0 |
| Total closings in this financing snapshot | 6 |
Cash share = closings coded Cash ÷ closings with known buyer financing. Other reported financing is the remaining known category; it can include mortgages and other arrangements. Blank, unknown or conflicting financing is excluded from both percentages and counted separately. These are MLS-reported closings; the financing period above may differ from other tables on this page.
| Other market group | Closings also in this group |
|---|---|
| No matched closing events in the other eight selected groups | 0 |
Matched by normalized parcel number, closing date and price. Missing parcel IDs limit cross-group matching; a zero match count does not certify non-overlapping geographic boundaries.
1 closings in August 2026, compared with 2 in July 2026 (1 fewer closings). The small counts do not support a percentage-based market-direction claim.
| Month | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2026 | 1 | $20,000,000 1 usable sale · single transaction | $2,413 1 usable sale · single transaction | 145 days 1 usable sale · single transaction |
| July 2026 | 2 | $14,000,000 2 usable sales · small sample: 2 sales | $2,421 2 usable sales · small sample: 2 sales | 5.5 days 2 usable sales · small sample: 2 sales |
| August 2025 | 0 | No eligible sales 0 usable sales | No eligible sales 0 usable sales | No eligible sales 0 usable sales |
Median $/living SF change from July 2026: -0.3% 2 baseline and 1 current usable sales · small-sample comparison. Calculation and sample rules.
| Year | Closed sales | Median sold price | Median sold $/living SF | Median market time | Year-on-year $/living SF change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 11 | $4,625,000 11 usable sales | $742 11 usable sales | 47 days 11 usable sales | Baseline |
| 2018 | 12 | $4,725,000 12 usable sales | $827 12 usable sales | 144 days 11 usable sales | +11.5% 11 baseline and 12 current usable sales |
| 2019 | 11 | $6,800,000 11 usable sales | $1,101 10 usable sales | 182 days 11 usable sales | +33.2% 12 baseline and 10 current usable sales |
| 2020 | 19 | $5,450,000 19 usable sales | $774 19 usable sales | 122 days 19 usable sales | -29.7% 10 baseline and 19 current usable sales |
| 2021 | 12 | $9,025,000 12 usable sales | $1,050 12 usable sales | 64 days 12 usable sales | +35.7% 19 baseline and 12 current usable sales |
| 2022 | 4 | $6,850,000 4 usable sales · small sample: 4 sales | $1,291 4 usable sales · small sample: 4 sales | 31 days 3 usable sales · small sample: 3 sales | +22.9% 12 baseline and 4 current usable sales · small-sample comparison |
| 2023 | 5 | $7,250,000 5 usable sales · small sample: 5 sales | $1,236 5 usable sales · small sample: 5 sales | 181 days 5 usable sales · small sample: 5 sales | -4.3% 4 baseline and 5 current usable sales · small-sample comparison |
| 2024 | 9 | $15,800,000 9 usable sales · small sample: 9 sales | $1,461 9 usable sales · small sample: 9 sales | 192 days 8 usable sales · small sample: 8 sales | +18.2% 5 baseline and 9 current usable sales · small-sample comparison |
| 2025 | 4 | $10,387,250 4 usable sales · small sample: 4 sales | $1,616 4 usable sales · small sample: 4 sales | 44.5 days 4 usable sales · small sample: 4 sales | +10.6% 9 baseline and 4 current usable sales · small-sample comparison |
| 2026 YTD | 6 | $14,000,000 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | $1,972 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | 7.5 days 6 usable sales · small sample: 6 sales | +22% 4 baseline and 6 current usable sales · small-sample comparison |
Year-on-year rows compare recorded calendar-year cohorts; 2026 is incomplete. Changes reflect property mix as well as pricing. They are not same-home appreciation.
Related market context
These reports provide related context. Each defines its own geography, property types and reporting dates; the links do not make the markets interchangeable.
Read the separate Royal Palm Yacht & Country Club community report in Boca Raton, including its housing mix and selected club comparisons.
Review Boca Villas sales, inventory and housing-type evidence as a separate community market.
See why housing type, location and the selected sales change the meaning of a market median.
Read the regional employment context alongside local housing evidence; job growth alone does not establish a property’s value.
Connect the waterfront routine you want with the particular home, shoreline and ownership arrangements. A broad market label or attractive water view cannot answer these property-specific questions.
Trace the actual route from the proposed dock to your destinations. Confirm current depth, tides, bridge clearances and opening arrangements for your vessel’s draft, beam and height. Check turning space and exposure at the dock. Compare current charts and navigation notices with a qualified local operator; a regional market report does not certify navigability.
Request the survey, recorded access documents, permits and maintenance history for the dock, lift and seawall. Obtain appropriate condition assessments and repair estimates. Verify approved use, dimensions, maintenance responsibility and any applicable submerged-land authorization with the relevant authorities and your advisers.
Review the property’s flood mapping, elevation information, drainage, wind protection and insurance quotes. Ask about past water intrusion and the expected care of waterfront structures, exterior finishes and equipment. The shoreline position, home construction and recorded history matter more than an area-wide description.
Check which waterfront, beach, dock, parking and shared spaces belong to the home or have documented access rights. Review applicable association obligations and guest arrangements. Visit at different times to assess privacy, traffic on the water, outdoor comfort and the household’s land-based routine. For a beachfront property, ask where the Coastal Construction Control Line lies and which approvals apply to intended changes.
These are questions for an individual purchase. Confirm current property documents, physical conditions, approvals, navigation information and insurance terms with the appropriate professionals.
Paste this request into an AI assistant that can read websites. It will use the Boca Raton Mainland – West of ICW community page to create a report around your interests using only this website’s published content.
Create a report about Boca Raton Mainland – West of ICW using https://davidabernathy.com/waterfront-homes/boca-raton-mainland-west-of-icw. Use only DavidAbernathy.com; do not search the wider web or open external links. Use preferences I have already given. If report length or priorities are missing, ask once in one message: “Would you like a brief overview or a detailed report, and what matters most to you?” After my answer, write the report directly. Organize it as Lifestyle → Market → Properties. Use the site’s published figures and dates. Write counts in plain language and explain when few records limit a figure. Omit information the site does not provide. If you cannot read the page, ask me to paste its text. Put David Abernathy’s credit, the preparation date and source-page link in the footer only.
For another community or waterfront area, open its page on DavidAbernathy.com and copy that page’s own report prompt. Its instructions reflect the property setting and the evidence available there.
Create a polished, standalone report about Boca Raton Mainland – West of ICW using https://davidabernathy.com/waterfront-homes/boca-raton-mainland-west-of-icw. The reader may never have visited DavidAbernathy.com. Write as a knowledgeable real estate agent introducing the area, its lifestyle strengths and the practical differences that matter when choosing a waterfront home. USE ONLY DAVIDABERNATHY.COM Use only https://davidabernathy.com/waterfront-homes/boca-raton-mainland-west-of-icw, relevant linked community reports, methodology and buyer guidance on DavidAbernathy.com (davidabernathy.com or www.davidabernathy.com). Read those pages and these report instructions. Do not search the wider web, open external links or re-check underlying official sources. Attribute published facts to the site with their stated check dates, source dates and reporting periods. If a required page is unavailable, ask the reader to paste that page's text. Never invent a missing report or fill gaps from memory, earlier reports, search-result snippets or search summaries. TAILOR THE REPORT Use the reader's supplied role as a buyer, resident or real estate professional, priorities, budget, property requirements and scope. If report length is not given, ask whether they want a brief overview or a longer detailed report. Combine that choice with only useful missing preferences in at most one initial message. Do not require every intake field or repeat supplied answers. Possible priorities include boating, water views, beach access, nature, family and guests, dining and social life, privacy, everyday convenience, market conditions and specific home requirements. For a boat-owning buyer, use the vessel and intended destinations already provided, or include those useful missing details in the same initial message. Tailor the emphasis to those answers; do not invent personal experience or assume the reader's preferences. If no initial question is needed, write the report immediately. After the reader answers, write the report directly. Do not ask for plan approval or confirmation to begin. If optional preferences remain unspecified, proceed without inventing them. FOLLOW THIS ORDER: LIFESTYLE → MARKET → PROPERTIES 1. LIFESTYLE Introduce the area and the local routine supported by its lifestyle section. Connect water surroundings, parks, nature, recreation and nearby destinations to household use. These Waterfront Homes pages describe selected report areas, not a single gated community or club. Use the lifestyle information published on DavidAbernathy.com and link that area report beside relevant claims, preserving its information-check date and source attribution. Distinguish nearby public facilities, commercial services and private memberships from amenities or rights attached to homeownership. Preserve current closures, phased projects and planned openings. Do not invent fees, membership eligibility, neighborhood boundaries, school assignments or travel times. Explain the difference between Atlantic shoreline, Intracoastal, river, canal and nearby coastal locations when supported. “Wide water”, a market name, an MLS city label or location east of the Intracoastal does not independently verify any property’s frontage, water width, boat access or beach rights. Nearby ocean access is not a guarantee of a usable route for a particular vessel. Do not promise fixed bridge clearance, channel depth, dock suitability or unrestricted beach access without current property-specific evidence. 2. MARKET Preserve the page’s exact market-group coverage, common report edition, stated sales period and each original file’s update date. The nine selected groups overlap and must not be summed as independent markets or described as all waterfront homes in Palm Beach County. The ten retained reference reports outside the selection do not expand the current collection. Explain Active listings, trailing-12-month sales, median sold price, median sold price per living square foot, derived market time, months of supply and known buyer-financing figures where supported. Active inventory uses listing identities, which are not necessarily unique homes. Where the page shows Active listings divided by a tax-property count, state the exact denominator and its scope; do not call it a certified share of occupied waterfront homes or a turnover rate. Use the ratio only with the page’s qualifications, and do not silently substitute a different property count. Condominiums and stock cooperatives are excluded from the reported MLS cohorts; townhouses, villas and other eligible residential types remain. Compare the actual housing mix before applying an area median to a home. Some supplied groups contain records not flagged waterfront; their median is not a verified direct-frontage premium. The Waterfront collection reports a figure from one usable transaction. Explain that a one-sale median is that sale’s value and that a few sales can change a comparison substantially; do not apply a different collection’s minimum-sales policy. Preserve missing values, metric-specific usable counts and positive-baseline limits. A concise annual price chart can add context when supported. Label 2026 as a partial year, and explain when full calendar years and year-to-date results are being compared. Changing sold-home cohorts are not repeat-sales appreciation or an individual property valuation. Monthly activity based on very few closings does not establish a broad direction of demand. MLS activity may omit off-MLS transactions. 3. PROPERTIES AND WATERFRONT FIT Describe the supported residential footprint, housing forms, property sizes and local groups. Include the exact residential tax-property count and verified homestead counts when available. Tax scope can include residential lots, redevelopment sites or eligible multifamily parcels; it does not certify occupied homes, individual dwelling units, physical waterfront status or an exact municipal boundary. Preserve tax and MLS scope differences and the page’s geography and waterfront-classification tables. Where useful, include verified owner-mailing destination counts in aggregate. A mailing destination is not an owner’s origin, nationality, primary residence, unique household or purchase intent. Homestead coding does not establish actual occupancy. Do not reproduce private owner identities or addresses. Use the page’s waterfront buyer guide to connect the home search with practical checks: the actual vessel route, current depth and tides, bridges, dock and lift dimensions, seawall condition, survey and recorded access rights, relevant permits, property exposure, flood/elevation information, insurance quotes, maintenance and any association obligations. Treat unverified answers as questions for the appropriate provider, authority or qualified adviser. Do not present a market report as a navigation, structural, title, legal or insurance determination. FINISH WITH USEFUL NEXT QUESTIONS Offer a short set of visit or search questions tied to the reader’s priorities. Ask how water use, outdoor living, guest arrangements and land-based routines work from the particular home. A good view, a usable dock and a convenient boat route are separate considerations. EVIDENCE AND DATES Use the published website content you actually read. Preserve each source’s date, reporting period, definitions and number of usable records. Distinguish the report preparation date, the page/lifestyle review date, the common report edition and the actual MLS and Tax file update dates. An earlier source cutoff does not become newer because the report edition is later. Do not replace the published period with a newly inferred period or use today’s date or the latest transaction as a file update date. Use only the website's published evidence or its page text pasted by the reader. Do not retrieve original MLS or tax files, use other uploaded data or fill gaps from outside sources. Omit optional metrics or details not published on the site. Turn decision-relevant gaps into recommendations within the report for the reader to confirm later with the appropriate professional; do not make that confirmation a prerequisite to writing. Do not invent answers or add routine “not available” rows for optional information. Attribute published facts to DavidAbernathy.com and clearly label any simple calculation from its published figures. PRESENTATION Write supporting counts in plain language in text, tables and charts, such as “18 sales” or “based on 18 properties”. Use the actual count and type of records behind the figure. Avoid statistical symbols, count shorthand and unexplained abbreviations. Explain in everyday language when only a few records or missing data limit a conclusion. Use warm, professional prose that stands on its own. Include a table or chart only when supported and useful for the requested report length. Keep lifestyle first, market second and properties third. Avoid unsupported rankings, promises, personal experience or fees. Return a clearly formatted report in the conversation. Create a file or preview only if the reader requests one. CREDITS — FOOTER ONLY Market analysis by David Abernathy · [actual preparation date] Adapted from the Boca Raton Mainland – West of ICW Waterfront Homes page: https://davidabernathy.com/waterfront-homes/boca-raton-mainland-west-of-icw. For another community or area, open its exact page on DavidAbernathy.com and copy that page’s own report request or full instructions. Use the destination page’s collection-specific instructions rather than changing only the name and source link in this template.
Condos and co-ops are excluded; other residential MLS property types remain eligible. One eligible transaction is enough to report a figure. Small-sample labels identify fewer than ten usable sales.
MLS months of supply = Active listings ÷ (trailing-year sales ÷ 12). Each n is the usable count for that metric. A missing figure is not zero. Read the collection rules and metric definitions.
Closed-sales period: 2025-10-15 through 2026-10-14, inclusive, in America/New_York. Report edition: 2026-10-14. MLS file last updated: October 12, 2026. Tax file last updated: October 9, 2026. Original file dates are separate from the common report edition and sales period; an earlier file cutoff is not updated by a later edition. Source dates follow each file’s Drive modification date and do not prove that every off-MLS sale or late-reported event is present.
All Waterfront figures exclude MLS subtypes Condominium and Stock Cooperative. Townhouses, villas and other residential subtypes remain eligible. The same exclusions apply to sales, Active inventory, annual history, monthly figures and composition tables. Their boundaries are not independently certified; recorded city labels and housing mixes vary. No combined total, league-table rank or county-wide market estimate is calculated. A city is the recorded MLS label, not a surveyed municipal boundary. “Wide water” is a source-group name, not a measured width. Ocean access alone does not establish direct frontage.
Source mapping and physical boundaries remain distinct: export membership has been checked against wf_region_name, but saved boundary polygons, a city-label crosswalk and parcel-level frontage verification were not in the source folders. Conflicting records and historical label anomalies are disclosed. Tax records provide residential parcel/property counts and recorded situs and classification fields; they do not establish occupied-home or dwelling-unit counts, turnover rates, waterfront status or a waterfront premium.
Market analysis and comparison methodology by David Abernathy. Data derived from BeachesMLS and identified public sources. Comparison communities are editorial selections intended to provide market context, not evidence of buyer cross-shopping, and may change over time.
Figures are derived from BeachesMLS records. Property types use MLS classifications. Tax files support the audit and do not determine the reported housing type or sales figures.
Legacy export name: Boca Raton Mainland - West of ICW. Every MLS row matched that wf_region_name. Display wording reflects the observed source population; the established URL is retained.
Property-type exclusions: 0 trailing-year closing events and 0 Active listings removed; 0 closed events excluded across the full source history. MLS subtypes excluded: Condominium and Stock Cooperative. All headline, historical and monthly metrics use the retained cohort.
This report is built from BeachesMLS listing exports and property-tax records. MLS data supplies geography, property type, waterfront flags, listing status, dates, prices and living area; tax data supplies the residential parcel/property counts, situs fields and county classification groups used in the property-count tables and, where shown, availability context; it does not determine MLS sales, property type or waterfront classification. Source completeness and fingerprints are verified internally, but raw filenames, links, identifiers and fingerprints are not published.
These audit counts cover the original unfiltered file, including excluded condos/co-ops, across all statuses and years. They are not the population used in the reported metrics or unique home counts.
MLS city labels: Boca Raton: 540.
MLS property types: Single Family Residence: 540.
MLS waterfront flags: false: 4; true: 536.
Observed closing dates: 2000-04-28 through 2026-08-19. Transaction dates do not establish source freshness.
Tax: 391 rows; 161 distinct populated parcel IDs. Rows include repeated building/land records and may include vacant/nonresidential uses; unique parcel counts are not certified home counts. Tax and MLS populations are not assumed equivalent. The collection summary generated 2026-10-14 reports 391 tax rows, matching the supplied tax file. Neither row count is reported as certified housing inventory.
Tax situs city labels (row counts): BOCA RATON: 391.
540 unique listing keys; 1 duplicate closing rows collapsed across the full history; 0 closed records without a usable closing date; 0 future-dated closings excluded.
Conflicting duplicate fields: days: 1. Affected geography/housing/water rows are labeled conflicting; conflicting market-time and living-area observations are withheld.
Current-value revisions reflect condo/co-op exclusions, the one-observation reporting rule and, where present, removal of conflicting market-time or living-area observations.
Analysis by David Abernathy from BeachesMLS exports and property-tax records. The tables publish aggregates; licensed listing records and owner information are not republished.
The group result supplies context. A property analysis can narrow the evidence to housing type, location and verified water access.
Request a private property analysisA CLEARER PERSPECTIVE
Places, People, The research behind the decision