Skip to content
David AbernathyLUXURY REAL ESTATE · MARKET INTELLIGENCEA private conversation
← Distinctive Communities / reports

Distinctive Communities · all residential MLS property types

Paddock Park

The local differences, The market evidence, A clearer perspective on your next move

Distinctive Communities · Palm Beach County market analysis
Representative community lifestyle scene for Paddock Park
Paddock ParkRepresentative lifestyle image · Local sales, inventory and housing-stock evidence

THE CURRENT PICTURE

Begin with the evidence

Paddock Park recorded 16 MLS-reported sales from October 15, 2025 through October 14, 2026, with a median sold price of $2,674,500 and median sold price per living square foot of $612. Active inventory was 15 listings on October 14, 2026. Recent sales carry Wellington MLS city labels. Paddock Park 1 recorded 6 closings with 10 Active listings; Paddock Park 2 recorded 10 with 5 Active. Those ratios are 20 and 6 MLS months of supply respectively. Combining the two conceals their different inventory-to-sales ratios. Owners should review current competition; buyers should compare size and condition within this community. All residential MLS property types are included; the housing mix affects the combined median.

A CLEARER WAY THROUGH THE REPORT

Start with your decision

Use the path that fits why you are exploring Paddock Park. Every figure links back to its period, sample and source.

FOR OWNERS

Thinking of selling?

Start with recent sales, current competition and selling pace, then narrow the comparison to your home.

See the market evidence
FOR BUYERS

Considering a home here?

Explore daily life, recreation and the community’s setting, then compare the housing types and homes that fit your priorities.

Explore the community

What the Paddock Park evidence shows

Sales 2025-10-15 through 2026-10-14; Active listings 2026-10-14.

  1. Paddock Park 1 recorded 6 closings with 10 Active listings; Paddock Park 2 recorded 10 with 5 Active. Those ratios are 20 and 6 MLS months of supply respectively. Combining the two conceals their different inventory-to-sales ratios. Supporting table.
  2. 15 Active listings equal 4.24% of the 354 residential parcels identified in the supplied tax file. The denominator includes residential vacant lots and excludes nonresidential records; the rate is current availability, not turnover. Supporting table.
  3. Comparable median sold $/living SF for January 1, 2026 through October 14, 2026 is +219.4% versus January 1, 2016 through October 14, 2016 (18 baseline and 11 current observations). These recorded year-to-date windows compare transaction cohorts, not repeat sales of the same homes. Supporting table.
  4. 11 of 16 closings with known financing were recorded as cash (68.8%). Financing describes the observed closing mix; it does not determine the terms available to another buyer. Supporting table.

Trailing-year sales and current inventory

Paddock Park: sales 10/15/25 through 10/14/26; Active 10/14/26
CommunityClosed salesMedian sold priceMedian sold $/living SFMedian market timeActive listingsAvailabilityMLS Months of supply1-year comparable $/LSF change5-year comparable $/LSF change10-year comparable $/LSF change
Paddock Park16$2,674,500 16 usable sales$612 16 usable sales78.5 days 16 usable sales154.24% 15 / 35411.3 16 usable sales closings-6.1% 16 baseline and 11 current usable sales+103.7% 25 baseline and 11 current usable sales+219.4% 18 baseline and 11 current usable sales

Compare all 13 communities · Definitions and sample rules

Contract timing

When contracts are signed in Paddock Park

This chart and the findings use this market’s recorded contract dates. The month of contract is different from the month a home was listed.

Contract timing: Paddock ParkMonthly counts of recorded contracts. February had the most in 2021–2025, with 19 of 124 contracts. February through April had 47 contracts.Contracts signed by month2015–192021–2505101520JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecFebruary–April: 32 contracts in 2015–19; 47 in 2021–25
Paddock Park contracts by PurchaseContractDate, full calendar years, Bars show contract counts, not rates; the period totals are 132 in 2015–2019 and 124 in 2021–2025, The two periods each have at least 30 recorded contracts, 2020 and partial 2026 are excluded
Monthly contract counts behind this chart
Month2015–20192021–2025
January1212
February1319
March1015
April913
May1311
June136
July129
August106
September129
October1010
November76
December118

What this market shows

In Paddock Park, 47 of 124 recorded contracts in 2021–2025 were signed from February through April (37.9%). February had the most contracts: 19.

February–April accounted for 24.2% of 132 contracts in 2015–2019. The later share was 13.7 percentage points higher. This compares different homes over two complete five-year periods; it does not establish the best listing date for an individual property.

MLS file last updated: September 27, 2026. Contracts are grouped by PurchaseContractDate; 2020 and the partial 2026 year are excluded from the comparisons. All residential property types are included.

Read the full contract-seasonality analysis ↗

Wellington space and equestrian surroundings

Lifestyle at Paddock Park

Paddock Park combines two distinct Wellington subdivisions in this report. Its lifestyle conversation includes private grounds, equestrian interests and the village’s public recreation and international horse-sport setting.

Location
Wellington; this page combines the separately named Paddock Park 1 and Paddock Park 2 sources.
Setting
Residential grounds and equestrian properties require individual comparison.
Homes to consider
Existing barns, turnout, usable land and approvals should be reviewed for the exact parcel.
Amenities and access
Village trails, sports facilities and horse shows are separate from private property rights.

I would introduce Paddock Park by separating the property you want from the activities you want nearby. A residential home and a working horse property can serve very different households. Confirm whether an address is in Paddock Park 1 or Paddock Park 2 before comparing land, improvements and permitted uses.

01

The neighborhoods

Start with the correct Paddock Park

This website combines the separately named Paddock Park 1 and Paddock Park 2 market sources, while an individual search should retain that distinction. On a tour, compare the actual lot and building arrangement with your plans for gardens, outdoor entertaining or horses. One property’s equestrian features do not establish what is permitted or available at another address.

Wellington Paddock Park map

02

Riding connections

Explore Wellington’s trail network

Wellington maintains an equestrian trail system. Its 2024 trail circulation planning includes the Paddock Park and Saddle Trail area. Explore the existing mapped routes from a candidate property, noting crossings, access conditions and current trail rules. A location near a mapped trail does not by itself prove direct riding access.

Wellington equestrian community · Adopted equestrian trail plan

03

Horse-sport surroundings

Be part of Wellington’s equestrian world

Wellington International hosts the Winter Equestrian Festival, Global Dressage Festival and additional seasonal horse shows. Competitors and spectators can build time at those venues into their routine, with event and hospitality arrangements handled by the operator. For a buyer with horses, compare practical transport and preparation needs; for other households, attending a show can be an enjoyable part of living in Wellington.

Wellington International

04

Recreation for the household

Enjoy village facilities beyond the farm

The public Wellington Aquatics Center has separate competition and recreation pools, including a zero-depth entry play area. The Amphitheater adds concerts and community events beside Scott’s Place playground. These give household members different ways to use the village beyond equestrian sport. Check admission, program registration and the actual journey from the home; these facilities are not a private Paddock Park amenity package.

Wellington Aquatics Center · Wellington Amphitheater

05

A property that works

Match the land to the intended use

If horses are part of the plan, assess turnout, buildings, vehicle movement, drainage and everyday care together. Wellington publishes equestrian guidance, including livestock-waste requirements and information about its preserve area. Verify the property’s exact zoning, approvals and any recorded restrictions before assuming that an existing barn or a large parcel permits a particular equestrian operation, additional buildings or seasonal rental use.

Wellington equestrian questions

What to explore on your first visit

Paddock Park is worth considering for a household seeking Wellington space and equestrian surroundings. I would compare the two neighborhoods and individual property layouts before weighing the house, recreation choices and ownership commitments.

  • Is the property in Paddock Park 1 or Paddock Park 2, and what zoning and recorded restrictions apply?
  • Are our intended horse uses, existing buildings and any proposed improvements approved for this parcel?
  • How do the usable riding route, trailer access, drainage and maintenance fit our everyday plans?
Community information checked October 13, 2026Wellington equestrian communityDetails above summarize the linked sources. Confirm current facilities, access, planned openings and property-specific association arrangements with the community or relevant provider.

Properties by street and reporting group

Counts use distinct residential tax parcels, including residential lots and redevelopment sites. Each classification separately accounts for all 354 properties. Missing or conflicting tax labels remain unassigned. Tax labels can differ from MLS reporting labels; unavailable matches are not zero. Tax housing groups combine townhouses with villas and condos with co-ops. Multifamily parcels, where eligible, count as properties rather than dwelling units.

Street
Street · residential property counts · 1 of 3
StreetProperties (tax records)
CLYDESDALE AVE13
DEERWOOD CT3
DRAFT HORSE LN35
FARRIER PL6
GREENTREE TRL24
HALTER RD17
HAYMARKET CT2
HORSESHOE TRCE72
MORGAN CLOSE4
Street · residential property counts · 2 of 3
StreetProperties (tax records)
OATLAND CT3
PACER CIR23
PADDOCK DR25
PELHAM RD2
PINTO CIR4
RANCHWOOD CT6
ROAN CT3
SPUR CLOSE2
Street · residential property counts · 3 of 3
StreetProperties (tax records)
SQUIRE DR31
STIRRUP LN41
TANBARK TRL10
TROTTER CT10
TURF LN1
WELLINGTON TRCE11
WESTBURY CLOSE3
WITHER CLOSE3
Total properties
354
Tax city label
Tax city label · residential property counts
Tax city labelProperties (tax records)
WELLINGTON354
Total354
Tax development
Tax development · residential property counts
Tax developmentProperties (tax records)
Paddock Park 1 Of Wellington247
Paddock Park 2 Of Wellington107
Total354
Tax subdivision
Tax subdivision · residential property counts
Tax subdivisionProperties (tax records)
Paddock Park 1 Of Wellington247
Paddock Park 2 Of Wellington107
Total354
Tax housing group
Tax housing group · residential property counts
Tax housing groupProperties (tax records)
Single Family Residence354
Total354

Housing, geography and local groups

Closed sales cover October 15, 2025 through October 14, 2026; Active inventory is dated October 14, 2026. Housing, city and development tables describe the same sales from different angles. Medians require five usable observations.

MLS city labels
Recorded classificationProperties (tax records)Closed salesMedian sold priceMedian sold $/living SFActive listingsMLS Months of supply
Wellington35416$2,674,500 16 usable sales$612 16 usable sales1511.3
MLS property subtypes
Recorded classificationProperties (tax records)Closed salesMedian sold priceMedian sold $/living SFActive listingsMLS Months of supply
Single Family Residence35416$2,674,500 16 usable sales$612 16 usable sales1511.3
Development groups
Recorded classificationProperties (tax records)Closed salesMedian sold priceMedian sold $/living SFActive listingsMLS Months of supply
Paddock Park 1 Of Wellington2476$2,769,500 6 usable sales$606 6 usable sales1020
Paddock Park 2 Of Wellington10710$2,627,500 10 usable sales$655 10 usable sales56
Recorded subdivision labels with at least five sales, plus parent/unassigned labels
Recorded classificationProperties (tax records)Closed salesMedian sold priceMedian sold $/living SFActive listingsMLS Months of supply
Paddock Park 1 Of Wellington2476$2,769,500 6 usable sales$606 6 usable sales1020
Paddock Park 2 Of Wellington10710$2,627,500 10 usable sales$655 10 usable sales56

Some sources provide only the parent development label. Those rows do not establish separate neighborhoods. Legal plat labels are retained as recorded. Where a finding refers to a low-volume group, its count is in the expandable table immediately above.

Owner mailing footprint · Paddock Park

Where owners direct their tax mail

A starting point for considering listing outreach, alongside recent sales and other market evidence.

51 of 361 parcels (14.1%) have a recorded mailing address that differs from the property address. These counts describe tax-mail destinations, not residency, unique households or where buyers moved from.

See the combined Distinctive Communities state and county totals →

6 address comparisons need review. 6 have unavailable or confidential mailing details; 0 have possible same-property street or unit variations. They are included in the parcel total and excluded from both the same-property and off-property counts below.

Residential parcels / lots
361
Mail sent to the property
304
Mail sent elsewhere
51
U.S. states / districts
11

Leading mailing counties

Off-property addresses only · one count per parcel

County / stateParcelsTax records
Palm Beach CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence →24View records ↗
Honolulu CountyHawaii5—
Kings CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence →2View records ↗
Miami-Dade CountyFlorida2—
Berkshire CountyMassachusetts1—
Cook CountyIllinoisExplore county parcel intelligence →1View records ↗
Dodge CountyWisconsin1—

45 of 48 U.S. off-property mailings have a county assignment: 42 address matches and 3 ZIP-based estimates. 3 remain unresolved. Rankings include the estimates and can change as unresolved addresses are matched.

Top mailing states

48 off-property U.S. addresses

  1. Florida29
  2. New York6
  3. Hawaii5
  4. Georgia1
  5. Illinois1

3 international mailings are excluded from U.S. state and county rankings.

Search Palm Beach County Property Appraiser ↗Search Palm Beach County tax bills ↗
Full totals by state and county

Open a state to see its counties. State totals include unresolved counties. Each number counts parcels with off-property mailing addresses.

Florida 29 parcels
County / stateParcelsAddress matchedZIP basedTax records
Palm Beach CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence →24222View records ↗
Miami-Dade CountyFlorida220—
St. Lucie CountyFloridaExplore county parcel intelligence →110View records ↗
Walton CountyFlorida110View records ↗

County unresolved: 1.

New York 6 parcels
County / stateParcelsAddress matchedZIP basedTax records
Kings CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence →220View records ↗
Dutchess CountyNew York101—
New York County (Manhattan)New YorkExplore county parcel intelligence →110View records ↗
Rensselaer CountyNew York110—
Suffolk CountyNew YorkExplore county parcel intelligence →110View records ↗

County unresolved: 0.

Hawaii 5 parcels
County / stateParcelsAddress matchedZIP basedTax records
Honolulu CountyHawaii550—

County unresolved: 0.

Georgia 1 parcels
County / stateParcelsAddress matchedZIP basedTax records
Fulton CountyGeorgiaExplore county parcel intelligence →110—

County unresolved: 0.

Illinois 1 parcels
County / stateParcelsAddress matchedZIP basedTax records
Cook CountyIllinoisExplore county parcel intelligence →110View records ↗

County unresolved: 0.

Massachusetts 1 parcels
County / stateParcelsAddress matchedZIP basedTax records
Berkshire CountyMassachusetts110—

County unresolved: 0.

Michigan 1 parcels

No county assignments are available for this scope.

County unresolved: 1.

Tennessee 1 parcels
County / stateParcelsAddress matchedZIP basedTax records
Williamson CountyTennessee110—

County unresolved: 0.

Texas 1 parcels
County / stateParcelsAddress matchedZIP basedTax records
Waller CountyTexas110—

County unresolved: 0.

Virginia 1 parcels

No county assignments are available for this scope.

County unresolved: 1.

Wisconsin 1 parcels
County / stateParcelsAddress matchedZIP basedTax records
Dodge CountyWisconsin110—

County unresolved: 0.

Source, scope and address matching

Prepared 2026-10-12 from the tax snapshots underlying the established property directories (source files modified 2026-09-05). These file dates do not establish a tax-roll year. This scope contains 354 developed residential parcels and 7 residential vacant lots. Commercial, common-area and agricultural classifications are excluded. Multiple parcels belonging to one owner count separately.

Capitalization, punctuation, common street abbreviations, unit labels and ZIP+4 suffixes are normalized. Recorded legal-unit aliases are used when they identify one parcel at a building; mailing to a different recorded unit remains off-property. Uncertain local street or unit variants and confidential or missing mailing details are withheld from the off-property rankings. A different mailing address elsewhere within the same community can still qualify.

Counties use the U.S. Census Geocoder. If a street cannot be matched, a county is estimated only when its 2020 Census ZIP area falls in a single county and agrees with the mailing state. A ZIP area is an approximation of postal delivery geography; ZIP-based counts are estimates. County boundaries use the 2020 vintage, including Connecticut’s historical counties. Connecticut tax assessments are maintained by towns.

Published figures contain aggregate counts only. A mailing destination can be a home, business, trustee, adviser or post-office box. Unresolved addresses may change the final rankings.

How to use this evidence

Tax-mail destinations may be personal or second residences, businesses, family offices, trusts, registered agents, attorneys or accountants. These records describe existing ownership as of the source snapshot; they do not establish primary residence, where wealth is held, buyer origin, decision-making authority or purchase intent. Long-held properties and recent purchases both appear in this ownership snapshot.

IRS migration data measures year-to-year tax-filing address changes for a different population and period. It is complementary context, not a count of incoming homebuyers. Neither dataset identifies a qualified buyer or proves future demand.

Build an outreach plan around the property

Combine the ownership mailing footprint with relevant sales, pricing and the home’s specific appeal when considering listing distribution.

Request a listing outreach strategy →

Inventory availability relative to housing stock

Paddock Park: Active inventory 10/14/26 compared with tax-record residential stock
Housing categoryTax-record housing stockActive listingsAvailabilityTrailing-year salesMLS Months of supply
All residential354154.24%1611.3 16 usable sales
Single family354154.24%1611.3 16 usable sales
Condominium / cooperativeNo matching tax stock0Unavailable0Limited sample 0 usable sales
Townhome / villaNo matching tax stock0Unavailable0Limited sample 0 usable sales

Availability is Active listings ÷ tax-record housing stock. Property-type MLS months of supply is shown only with at least five sales. The overall row uses unique residential parcels and is not the sum of MLS listing counts.

Buyer financing

Cash and other buyer financing

Buyer-financing period: through . Source: BeachesMLS; financing snapshot 2026-10-14.

68.8% of the 16 closings with known buyer financing were coded Cash (11 cash purchases). Other reported financing accounted for 31.3% (5 closings).

Buyer financing · Paddock Park · 10/15/25 through 10/14/26
MeasureClosings
Cash purchases11
Other reported financing5
Closings with known buyer financing16
Unknown or unreported buyer financing0
Total closings in this financing snapshot16

Cash share = closings coded Cash ÷ closings with known buyer financing. Other reported financing is the remaining known category; it can include mortgages and other arrangements. Blank, unknown or conflicting financing is excluded from both percentages and counted separately. These are MLS-reported closings; the financing period above may differ from other tables on this page.

Comparable 1-, 5- and 10-year sold $/living SF

Paddock Park: matched year-to-date transaction cohorts
HorizonBaseline periodBaseline median $/LSFCurrent periodCurrent median $/LSFChange
1 year01/01/25–10/14/25$619 16 usable sales01/01/26–10/14/26$581 11 usable sales-6.1% 16 baseline and 11 current usable sales
5 years01/01/21–10/14/21$285 25 usable sales01/01/26–10/14/26$581 11 usable sales+103.7% 25 baseline and 11 current usable sales
10 years01/01/16–10/14/16$182 18 usable sales01/01/26–10/14/26$581 11 usable sales+219.4% 18 baseline and 11 current usable sales

Each change requires at least ten usable observations in both matched periods. These transaction-level medians compare different sold cohorts and do not measure same-home appreciation.

August 2026: recorded activity

2 closings in August 2026 and 1 in July 2026: 1 more closings. Small monthly counts do not establish a broad change in demand.

Latest complete month and comparison months
MonthClosed salesMedian sold priceMedian sold $/living SFMedian market time
August 20262Limited sample 2 usable salesLimited sample 2 usable salesLimited sample 2 usable sales
July 20261Limited sample 1 usable saleLimited sample 1 usable saleLimited sample 1 usable sale
August 20251Limited sample 1 usable saleLimited sample 1 usable saleLimited sample 1 usable sale

Median $/living SF change from July 2026: Limited comparison 1 baseline and 2 current usable sales. Sample rules.

Annual market evidence

Calendar-year sales; 2026 partial through 10/14/26
YearClosed salesMedian sold priceMedian sold $/living SFMedian market timeYear-on-year $/living SF change
201713$680,000 13 usable sales$189 13 usable sales133 days 11 usable salesBaseline
201821$750,000 21 usable sales$224 21 usable sales53.5 days 20 usable sales+18.5% 13 baseline and 21 current usable sales
201931$817,500 31 usable sales$219 31 usable sales51.5 days 30 usable sales-2.3% 21 baseline and 31 current usable sales
202021$675,000 21 usable sales$222 21 usable sales54 days 21 usable sales+1.4% 31 baseline and 21 current usable sales
202128$1,000,000 28 usable sales$286 28 usable sales24 days 26 usable sales+28.9% 21 baseline and 28 current usable sales
202214$1,202,500 14 usable sales$378 14 usable sales21 days 13 usable sales+31.9% 28 baseline and 14 current usable sales
202318$1,200,000 18 usable sales$390 18 usable sales54 days 15 usable sales+3.3% 14 baseline and 18 current usable sales
202423$1,400,000 23 usable sales$418 23 usable sales28 days 21 usable sales+7% 18 baseline and 23 current usable sales
202521$2,300,000 21 usable sales$630 21 usable sales66 days 21 usable sales+51% 23 baseline and 21 current usable sales
2026 YTD11$2,705,000 11 usable sales$581 11 usable sales76 days 11 usable sales-7.8% 21 baseline and 11 current usable sales

Changes describe different sold cohorts. They are not repeat-sales appreciation, and 2026 is an incomplete year.

Related market context

Put this market in context

These reports provide related context. Each defines its own geography, property types and reporting dates; the links do not make the markets interchangeable.

Related market reports

Analysis and perspective

David Abernathy is a Palm Beach County real estate agent with Waterfront Properties & Club Communities, where he served as Business Manager from 2008 through August 2026. During that tenure, he helped lead the development of Waterfront’s award-winning artificial-intelligence initiatives. He was 2020 JTHS-MIAMI president, serves on the MIAMI REALTORS® division board and is confirmed for the 2027 BeachesMLS board. His individual honors include MIAMI REALTORS® Thought Leader of the Year and JTHS-MIAMI AI Innovator of the Year.

Credentials, board service and speaking · David’s approach to applied AI

Make a report about Paddock Park with your AI

Paste this request into an AI assistant that can read websites. It will use the Paddock Park community page to create a report around your interests using only this website’s published content.

Create a report about Paddock Park using https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/paddock-park. Use only DavidAbernathy.com; do not search the wider web or open external links.

Use preferences I have already given. If report length or priorities are missing, ask once in one message: “Would you like a brief overview or a detailed report, and what matters most to you?” After my answer, write the report directly.

Organize it as Lifestyle → Market → Properties. Use the site’s published figures and dates. Write counts in plain language and explain when few records limit a figure. Omit information the site does not provide. If you cannot read the page, ask me to paste its text.

Put David Abernathy’s credit, the preparation date and source-page link in the footer only.

For another community or waterfront area, open its page on DavidAbernathy.com and copy that page’s own report prompt. Its instructions reflect the property setting and the evidence available there.

Read the full report instructions
Create a polished, standalone report about Paddock Park using https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/paddock-park. The reader may never have visited the website. Write as a knowledgeable real estate agent introducing the community, its strengths and how it could fit a household’s life.

USE ONLY DAVIDABERNATHY.COM
Use only https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/paddock-park, relevant linked community reports, methodology and buyer guidance on DavidAbernathy.com (davidabernathy.com or www.davidabernathy.com). Read those pages and these report instructions. Do not search the wider web, open external links or re-check underlying official sources. Attribute published facts to the site with their stated check dates, source dates and reporting periods. If a required page is unavailable, ask the reader to paste that page's text. Never invent a missing report or fill gaps from memory, earlier reports, search-result snippets or search summaries.

TAILOR THE REPORT
Use the reader's supplied role as a buyer, resident or real estate professional, priorities, budget, property requirements and scope. If report length is not given, ask whether they want a brief overview or a longer detailed report. Combine that choice with only useful missing preferences in at most one initial message. Do not require every intake field or repeat supplied answers. Possible priorities include everyday convenience, recreation, family and guests, dining and social life, space and privacy, price and market conditions, or particular home requirements. Tailor the emphasis to those answers. For a buyer, help them understand the community and make a focused search. For a resident, explain the lifestyle and current market context. For a real estate professional, emphasize supported comparisons, client fit and useful questions. Do not invent personal experience or assume preferences the reader has not given. If no initial question is needed, write the report immediately. After the reader answers, write the report directly. Do not ask for plan approval or confirmation to begin. If optional preferences remain unspecified, proceed without inventing them.

FOLLOW THIS ORDER: LIFESTYLE → MARKET → PROPERTIES

1. LIFESTYLE
Introduce the community and explain what gives it its appeal. Use the lifestyle section to connect its setting, recreation, gathering places and nearby destinations to practical household use. Cover only the offerings supported for this community. Use the lifestyle information published on DavidAbernathy.com and link that community report beside relevant claims, preserving its information-check date and source attribution. Distinguish community-owned amenities from nearby public facilities, commercial services and voluntary or private memberships. Identify eligibility, access and costs only when verified. Clearly distinguish existing offerings from planned facilities, and preserve any stated project dates. Do not assume golf, clubhouse facilities or amenity access comes with homeownership. Do not invent neighborhood boundaries, school assignments, travel times, association obligations, rental rules, aviation access or equestrian permissions.

2. MARKET
Explain buyer choice using active listings as a percentage of total residential properties, when both measures are supported. Include trailing-12-month sales, median sold price, median sold price per living square foot, selling time, months of supply and reported cash purchases where available. Explain what each measure means for the reader. Use a concise annual price chart for perspective when the data supports it. Label partial years, figures based on only a few sales and changing property mix. Community medians are not an individual property valuation or a repeat-sales appreciation measure. Explain supported differences between detached homes, townhouses and other recorded housing types before comparing their prices. Preserve the page’s exact geographic and source-group coverage. Where applicable, state that MLS-reported activity may exclude builder-direct or other off-MLS sales and inventory; do not present it as a complete count of every available home. Avoid unexplained rankings or unsupported market claims.

3. PROPERTIES AND COMMUNITY
Describe the residential footprint and supported property types, sizes, lots, setting, condition or renovation considerations. Include the total property count and verified homestead counts and percentages where available. A short owner-mailing overview may include verified state or country destination counts. Mailing destinations must never be presented as owner origins, nationalities, primary residency, unique households or purchase intent. Homestead tax coding does not establish actual occupancy. Use only the local groups and property characteristics published on this page or its relevant linked reports on DavidAbernathy.com. Recommend later property-specific confirmation of association rules, homeownership costs, utility service, restrictions and specialized uses; do not research those answers for this report.

FINISH WITH USEFUL NEXT QUESTIONS
Offer a short set of visit or search questions tied to the reader’s priorities. Include current association costs and obligations, recreation access, guest arrangements, maintenance responsibilities, new-construction terms and planned-project timing where relevant. For communities with aviation, acreage or equestrian features, ask about the specific property’s access, facilities, rules and permitted uses. Treat unverified answers as questions for the association, builder, relevant authority or agent, not as established facts.

EVIDENCE AND DATES
Use the published website content you actually read. Preserve each source’s stated update date, reporting period, definitions and the number of usable records behind each measure. Distinguish the date the report is prepared from the dates of its evidence. Use the source dates and periods published on the community page; do not infer an exact MLS file-update date from today’s date, the latest transaction or the date you opened the page. If sources have different cutoffs, keep those differences visible. Do not silently recalculate a different period.

Use only the website's published evidence or its page text pasted by the reader. Do not retrieve original MLS or tax files, use other uploaded data or fill gaps from outside sources. Omit optional metrics or details not published on the site. Turn decision-relevant gaps into recommendations within the report for the reader to confirm later with the appropriate professional; do not make that confirmation a prerequisite to writing. Do not invent answers or add routine “not available” rows for optional information. Attribute published facts to DavidAbernathy.com and clearly label any simple calculation from its published figures. Use aggregate community information; do not reproduce private owner identities or addresses.

PRESENTATION
Write supporting counts in plain language in text, tables and charts, such as “18 sales” or “based on 18 properties”. Use the actual count and type of records behind each figure; sales, listings and properties are different. Avoid statistical symbols, count shorthand and unexplained abbreviations. Explain in everyday language when only a few records or missing data limit a conclusion.

Use warm, professional prose that stands on its own. Include a table or chart only when supported and useful for the requested report length. Keep the progression clear: lifestyle first, market second, properties third. Avoid exaggeration, invented personal experience and unsupported fees, capacity, permissions or access guarantees. Return a clearly formatted report in the conversation. Create a file or preview only if the reader requests one.

CREDITS — FOOTER ONLY
Market analysis by David Abernathy · [actual preparation date]
Adapted from the Paddock Park community page: https://davidabernathy.com/luxury-homes/paddock-park.

For another community or area, open its exact page on DavidAbernathy.com and copy that page’s own report request or full instructions. Use the destination page’s collection-specific instructions rather than changing only the name and source link in this template.

Reporting period, definitions and sample rules

All residential MLS property types are eligible. Medians require five usable observations, percentage changes ten at each endpoint, and supply at least five sales.

MLS months of supply = Active listings ÷ (trailing-year sales ÷ 12). Each n is the usable count for that metric. A missing figure is not zero. Read the collection rules and metric definitions.

Detailed calculation and source notes

Closed sales: 2025-10-15 through 2026-10-14, inclusive in America/New_York. All 14 MLS exports are treated as the 2026-10-14 refresh. The source operator updates an export only when activity occurs, so an earlier Drive modified time means no activity since that timestamp; it does not make the export incomplete. Exact source timestamps remain visible in each report. Tax file dates are independent.

Source roles: BeachesMLS supplies community membership, listing status, dates, prices, living area, financing and MLS property type. Palm Beach County property-tax records supply residential parcel/property counts, situs fields and county classifications used for street/group tables, housing-stock denominators and availability. Tax data does not classify MLS sales or determine reported sale prices.

All residential MLS property subtypes are retained. These reports use complete development exports; geography follows source membership rather than a city-label filter. Distinctive Communities uses a five-observation median rule, ten-observation change rule and five-sale supply rule.

Closed sales
Latest record per ListingKey; Closed status, a usable CloseDate through the snapshot and a finite closing price of at least $10,000. Repeated normalized parcel, closing date and price combinations count once. ListingKey substitutes for a missing parcel. Active inventory counts latest listing keys marked Active, excluding pending and active-under-contract.
Medians and n
At least five eligible observations are required for a median; n identifies that metric's usable observations. Fewer than five display “Limited sample”; zero display “No eligible sales.” Neither means a zero price. Sold $/living SF is the median of transaction-level closing price divided by positive living area.
Market time
Calendar days from OnMarketDate, with ListingContractDate as fallback, to PurchaseContractDate. Valid intervals are 0–3,650 days. This is derived market time, not the MLS DOM field. Timezone-aware timestamps are converted to UTC; naive MLS timestamps are first assigned America/New_York. Conflicting duplicate intervals or living areas are withheld only from the affected metric.
Housing stock and availability
Overall housing stock counts unique improved residential parcels plus nonblank residential vacant-lot parcel IDs not already counted as improved. Nonresidential rows and blank parcel IDs are excluded. Property-type denominators use their individual improved residential classifications; vacant lots are included only in the overall denominator. The current overall denominator is 354 residential parcels: 354 improved residential parcels plus 0 additional residential vacant lots. Availability is current Active listings ÷ tax-record residential housing stock. Type-level availability maps MLS Single Family Residence to single-family stock, Condominium and Stock Cooperative to condominium stock, and Townhouse and Villa to townhome/villa stock. A zero tax denominator displays unavailable.
Months of supply
Active listings ÷ (trailing-year closed sales ÷ 12), overall and by property type where at least five sales support the rate. It is a ratio to the recent pace, not a forecast. Active listings are not a deduplicated count of physical homes.
Comparable price horizons
One-, five- and ten-year comparisons use transaction-level median sold $/living SF for the recorded current year-to-date period (January 1, 2026 through October 14, 2026) and the corresponding baseline date ranges shown in each price-horizon table. These are separate from the trailing-year sales cohort. Each endpoint requires ten usable observations and a positive baseline. These are different sold cohorts, not repeat-sales appreciation. The annual history table remains a separate calendar-year view; 2026 is partial through 2026-10-14.
Buyer financing
Cash share uses closings with a known financing classification. A duplicate closing event with conflicting financing values is classified as unknown. Financing is a candidate market signal, not a valuation adjustment.
Geography and subgroups
City labels are MLS classifications, not verified municipal boundaries. Development and subdivision labels identify supplied groups, not verified home models or comparable amenities. Parent-only subdivision labels are shown explicitly; an unnamed subgroup is not invented. Low-volume named groups retain counts in a collapsed table.

Source folder inventories did not contain saved boundary polygons, selection queries or a definitive city-label crosswalk. Tax-derived housing stock is an analytical denominator, not a certified unit count or turnover measure. No all-community total or peer rank is presented. Site methodology · David's credentials.

Sources and calculation details

Figures are derived from BeachesMLS records. Property types use MLS classifications. Tax files support the audit and do not determine the reported housing type or sales figures.

Inspect source files, coverage and revisions

This report is built from BeachesMLS listing exports and property-tax records. MLS data supplies community membership, status, dates, prices, living area and property type; tax data independently supports the housing-stock denominator described below and does not classify MLS sales. Source completeness and fingerprints are verified internally, but raw filenames, links, identifiers and fingerprints are not published.

Full-source geography, property types and data quality

These counts include all statuses and historical years, not just current sales. MLS city labels: Palm Beach: 1; Wellington: 934; West Palm Beach: 12. MLS property types: Single Family Residence: 947.

947 unique listing keys; 0 repeated closing events collapsed; 0 Closed records without usable dates; 0 future closings excluded; 0 records excluded for missing or sub-$10,000 prices. Conflicting duplicate fields: none. Affected classification rows remain visibly conflicting; affected metric values are withheld.

Tax records contain 482 rows, 354 distinct populated parcel IDs and 354 qualifying residential parcels used for housing-stock availability. Residential vacant lots are included; nonresidential land-use rows are excluded. This analytical denominator is not a certified unit count. Tax city labels: WELLINGTON: 482.

Changes from the previous report snapshot

The previous source update times were 2026-10-13T07:38:25.859Z; 2026-10-13T07:38:25.734Z. Current source dates are verified internally and used to define each report period. Earlier metadata recorded 0 geographic row exclusions across the full file; that filter's complete selection record was unavailable. This release consistently uses full development membership and discloses city labels. Revised market-time samples also exclude conflicting duplicate dates.

The six current headline figures reconcile to the prior snapshot; eligible metric counts may differ where duplicate fields conflict.

Analysis by David Abernathy, derived from BeachesMLS exports and property-tax records. Aggregate evidence only; licensed listing records and owner information are not republished. Source groups are editorial comparisons, not evidence of buyer cross-shopping.

Apply the evidence to your property

Housing form, location and individual features can differ from the combined community result. A property analysis can narrow the relevant sales.

Request a private property analysis

Explore Distinctive Communities

A CLEARER PERSPECTIVE

Explore with David

Places, People, The research behind the decision